ArticleJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)2012
Dynamics of CD4(+) T cell responses against Listeria monocytogenes.
Article in Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The divergent outcome of IL-4Rα signalling on Foxp3 T regulatory cells in listeriosis and tuberculosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Conversion of effector CD4Cellular & molecular immunology · 2021Article
- Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses duringMicrobiology spectrum · 2019Article
- Tuning T Cell Signaling Sensitivity Alters the Behavior of CD4Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2018Article
- Functional Heterogeneity in CD4(+) T Cell Responses Against a Bacterial Pathogen.Frontiers in immunology · 2015Review
- Systems modeling of molecular mechanisms controlling cytokine-driven CD4+ T cell differentiation and phenotype plasticity.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The generation of CD4(+) T cell memory cells is poorly understood. Recently, two different murine CD4(+) TCR transgenic T cell lines, LLO118 and LLO56, both specific for the same epitope but differing in their expression level of the cell surface protein CD5, were generated. Notably, these cell lines showed different behavior upon primary and secondary exposure to Listeria monocytogenes. Whereas LLO118 showed a stronger primary response and generated more robust CD8(+) T cell help upon secondary exposure, LLO56 CD4(+) T cells had a dramatically better recall response. Using different mathematical models, we analyzed the dynamics of the two CD4(+) T cell lines in mice during infection with L. monocytogenes. Our models allowed the quantitative comparison of the two T cell lines and provided predictions for the conversion of naive T cells into memory cells. LLO118 CD4(+) T cells are estimated to have a higher proliferation rate than LLO56 CD4(+) T cells upon primary exposure. This difference can be explained by the lower expression level of CD5 on LLO118 CD4(+) T cells. Furthermore, LLO56 memory cells are predicted to have a 3-fold longer half-life than LLO118 memory cells ($${t}_{1/2}^{\hbox{ LLO }118}$$ ≈ 4.3 to 5 d and $${t}_{1/2}^{\hbox{ LLO }56}$$ ≈ 11.5 to 13.9 d). Although both cell lines differ in their memory capabilities, our analysis indicates no difference in the rate at which memory cells are generated. Our results show that different CD5 expression levels influence the proliferation dynamics of activated naive CD4(+) T cells while leaving the conversion rate of those cells into memory cells unaffected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.