ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2013
New proteins for a new perspective on syphilis diagnosis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resurgence of syphilis: focusing on emerging clinical strategies and preclinical models.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Performance of Treponema pallidum recombinant proteins in the serological diagnosis of syphilis.PloS one · 2020Article
- Vaccine development for syphilis.Expert review of vaccines · 2017Review
- NovelBioMed research international · 2017Review
- Evaluation of the boson chemiluminescence immunoassay as a first-line screening test in the ECDC algorithm for syphilis serodiagnosis in a population with a high prevalence of syphilis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2015Article
- Recent trends in the serologic diagnosis of syphilis.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2015Review
- Evaluation of the recombinant protein TpF1 of Treponema pallidum for serodiagnosis of syphilis.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2013Article
- Efforts in blood safety: Integrated approach for serological diagnosis of syphilis.Asian journal of transfusion scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Syphilis is a sexually transmitted disease caused by Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum; it can be effectively treated with penicillin yet remains prevalent worldwide, due in part to the shortcomings of current diagnostic tests. Here we report the production of soluble recombinant versions of three novel diagnostic candidate proteins, Tp0326, Tp0453, and a Tp0453-Tp0326 chimera. The sensitivities of these recombinant proteins were assessed by screening characterized serum samples from primary, secondary, and latent stages of infection (n = 169). The specificities were assessed by screening false positives identified with the standard diagnostic testing algorithm (n = 21), samples from patients with potentially cross-reactive infections (Leptospira spp., Borrelia burgdorferi, Helicobacter pylori, Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or cytomegalovirus) (n = 38), and samples from uninfected individuals (n = 11). The sensitivities of Tp0326, Tp0453, and the Tp0453-Tp0326 chimera were found to be 86%, 98%, and 98%, respectively, and the specificities were 99%, 100%, and 99%. In a direct comparison, the Captia syphilis (T. pallidum)-G enzyme immunoassay (Trinity Biotech) was used to screen the same serum samples and was found to have a sensitivity of 98% and a specificity of 90%. In particular, Tp0453 and the chimera exhibited superior accuracy in classifying analytical false-positive samples (100%, compared to 43% for the Captia assay). These findings identify Tp0453 and the Tp0453-Tp0326 chimera as novel syphilis-specific diagnostic candidates that surpass the performance of a currently available diagnostic enzyme immunoassay test for syphilis and that allow accurate detection of all stages of infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.