ReviewCroatian medical journal2012
Does the patient with chest pain have a coronary heart disease? Diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs--a meta-analysis.
Review in Croatian medical journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine classical prescriptions for angina pectoris: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic accuracy of signs and symptoms in acute coronary syndrome and acute myocardial infarction.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Pooled it
- Causes of chest pain in primary care--a systematic review and meta-analysis.Croatian medical journal · 2015Pooled it
- Immune-related biomarkers in myocardial infarction; diagnostic/prognostic value and therapeutic potential.Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology · 2023Review
- Past, Present, and Future of Blood Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Promises and Challenges.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Effects of metoprolol on serum inflammatory factors and myocardial ischemia in rats modeled with coronary heart disease.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- Article
- Efficacy of ticagrelor in the treatment of stable coronary heart disease: A protocol of systematic review.Medicine · 2020Article
- Exploring the complex interactions of baseline patient factors to improve nursing triage of acute coronary syndrome.Research in nursing & health · 2020Article
- Biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction: current perspectives.Vascular health and risk management · 2019Review
- Article
- Presentation of Coronary Artery Disease in a Chiropractic Clinic: A Report of 2 Cases.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2016Article
- The Interdisciplinary Management of Acute Chest Pain.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015Review
- Diagnostic characteristics and prognoses of primary-care patients referred for clinical exercise testing: a prospective observational study.BMC family practice · 2014Observational
- Sensitivity, specificity, and sex differences in symptoms reported on the 13-item acute coronary syndrome checklist.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2014Article
- May chest pain describe coronary heart disease?Croatian medical journal · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo determine the diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with chest pain.
methodsSearches of two electronic databases (EMBASE 1980 to March 2008, PubMed 1966 to May 2009) and hand searching in seven journals were conducted. Eligible studies recruited patients presenting with acute or chronic chest pain. The target disease was CHD, with no restrictions regarding case definitions, eg, stable CHD, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute myocardial infarction (MI), or major cardiac event (MCE). Diagnostic tests of interest were items of medical history and physical examination. Bivariate random effects model was used to derive summary estimates of positive (pLR) and negative likelihood ratios (nLR).
resultsWe included 172 studies providing data on the diagnostic value of 42 symptoms and signs. With respect to case definition of CHD, diagnostically most useful tests were history of CHD (pLR=3.59), known MI (pLR=3.21), typical angina (pLR=2.35), history of diabetes mellitus (pLR=2.16), exertional pain (pLR=2.13), history of angina pectoris (nLR=0.42), and male sex (nLR=0.49) for diagnosing stable CHD; pain radiation to right arm/shoulder (pLR=4.43) and palpitation (pLR=0.47) for diagnosing MI; visceral pain (pLR=2.05) for diagnosing ACS; and typical angina (pLR=2.60) and pain reproducible by palpation (pLR=0.13) for predicting MCE.
conclusionsWe comprehensively reported the accuracy of a broad spectrum of single symptoms and signs for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. Our results suggested that the accuracy of several symptoms and signs varied in the published studies according to the case definition of CHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.