ArticleClinical orthopaedics and related research2013
Three-dimensional morphologic study of the child's hip: which parameters are reproducible?
Article in Clinical orthopaedics and related research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of patient axial malpositioning on the trueness and precision of pelvic parameters obtained from 3D reconstructions based on biplanar radiographs.European radiology · 2017Article
- Estimation of sagittal pelvic orientation from frontal standard radiograph using the sacral-femoral-pubic angle: feasibility study in the pediatric population.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBiplanar x-ray images obtained with patients in a standing weightbearing position allow reconstruction of three-dimensional (3-D) bone geometries, with lower radiation exposure than CT scans and better bone definition than MRI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined the reproducibility of 3-D parameter values of the hips and pelves of healthy children, using biplanar x-ray images.
methodsWe built 3-D models of the hips of 33 children without musculoskeletal problems: 10 subjects younger than 9 years and 23 who were 9 years or older. Three anatomic landmarks and nine hip and pelvic parameters were computed for each reconstruction. To determine the reliability of these landmarks and parameters, each bone was reconstructed four times by two independent observers, leading to a total of 264 reconstructions, and parameters were studied for the two age groups and compared between dancers and nondancers.
resultsTaking into account all reconstructions, the interobserver reproducibility ranged from 2 to 4 mm for landmark positions or distance parameters, and 2° to 6° for angular parameters. The most reproducible point was the center of the femoral head (range, 0.2-17 mm). The distance between this center and its projection on the plane fitting the edge of the acetabulum, and the pelvic tilt were the most reproducible parameters.
conclusionsReproducible 3-D reconstructions of hips and pelves of children were possible using biplanar x-ray images, regardless of the children's ages. Although we report preliminary values for 3-D parameters in healthy children's hips, further work is needed to obtain direct validation of our parameters using CT reconstructions of cadaveric specimens to avoid high doses of radiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.