Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23100146›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2013

Differential reactivity to IMPDH2 by anti-rods/rings autoantibodies and unresponsiveness to pegylated interferon-alpha/ribavirin therapy in US and Italian HCV patients.

Wendy C Carcamo, Angela Ceribelli, S John Calise, Claire Krueger, Chen Liu, Massimo Daves, Danilo Villalta, Nicola Bizzaro, Minoru Satoh, Edward K L Chan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Wendy C CarcamoDepartment of Oral Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0424, USA.
Angela Ceribelli
S John Calise
Claire Krueger
Chen Liu
Massimo Daves
Danilo Villalta
Nicola Bizzaro
Minoru Satoh
Edward K L Chan
University of Florida · USAzienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria Degli Angeli · ITOspedale di Bolzano · ITOspedale Sant Antonio · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutoantibodies to cytoplasmic structures called rods and rings (RR) are primarily specific to patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection treated with pegylated interferon-alpha/ribavirin (IFN/R). Our aim is to examine anti-RR antibodies specificity and correlation with the response to IFN/R therapy in two independent cohorts (US and Italy) of HCV patients.

methodsSera from the US cohort (n = 47) and the Italian cohort (n = 46) pre-selected for anti-RR antibodies were analyzed by immunofluorescence and radioimmunoprecipitation. The prevalence and titers of anti-RR were analyzed for correlation with the response to IFN/R therapy.

resultsIn the US cohort, anti-RR antibodies were more frequently non-responders to IFN/R (71 % vs 29 % responders). Titers in responder patients (n = 11) were ≤1:3200, whereas titers in non-responder patients (n = 27) reached 1:819,200 (p = 0.0016). In the Italian cohort, anti-RR titers ranged from 1:200 to >1:819,200 and only relapsers had the highest anti-RR titers. Radioimmunoprecipitation demonstrated that anti-RR autoantibodies were mainly anti-inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase 2 (IMPDH2) - 96 % in the Italian cohort vs. 53 % in the US cohort.

conclusionsIn the two cohorts analyzed, the anti-IMPDH2 response as a component of the anti-RR response is much more prominent in the Italian cohort. The reason for the difference between the US and Italian cohorts is unclear but it possibly illustrates the heterogeneity in response and the overall negative correlation between the production of these autoantibodies and response to IFN/R therapy. Patients with high titer anti-RR antibodies are either relapsers (Italian) or non-responders/relapsers (US).

Indexed as

Antibody SpecificityAntiviral AgentsAutoantibodiesCohort StudiesHepatitis CHumansIMP DehydrogenaseInterferon-alphaItalyPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsRibavirinSeroepidemiologic StudiesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesAntiviral AgentsAutoantibodiesIMP DehydrogenaseIMPDH2 protein, humanInterferon-alphapeginterferon alfa-2aPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant ProteinsRibavirin

Identifiers

PMID23100146
OpenAlexW2078798129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.