Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23100082›Full record

Trial reportEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2013

The evaluation of ozone and betahistine in the treatment of tinnitus.

Onur Sönmez, Ismail Külahlı, Alperen Vural, Mehmet Ilhan Sahin, Mesut Aydın

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Betahistine for tinnitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Review
  5. Evidence and evidence gaps in tinnitus therapy.GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery · 2016
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Onur SönmezNevsehir Dr. I. Sevki Atasagun State Hospital, Nevsehir, Turkey. kbbonursonmez@yahoo.com
Ismail Külahlı
Alperen Vural
Mehmet Ilhan Sahin
Mesut Aydın
Erciyes University · TRNevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ozone and betahistine treatments in the treatment of tinnitus. Sixty-eight patients were enrolled in this randomized, prospective controlled study. The ozone group consisted of 27, betahistine group consisted of 26 and control group consisted of 15 patients. The patients in ozone group received 10 sessions of ozone treatment via major autohemotherapy. Betahistine group received 48 mg/day betahistine tablets per oral for 3 months duration. The control group was followed up without any treatment given. The evaluation of tinnitus was made by tinnitus loudness and tinnitus handicap inventory (THI). The changes in findings from baseline to 3rd and 6th months were assessed, and the group results were compared. Comparison of the initial mean tinnitus loudness and 3 and 6 months after treatment in each of the three groups did not reveal a significant difference. The comparison between the groups in terms of the improvement of tinnitus loudness was not significant (p = 0.821). Comparison of the initial mean THI and 3 and 6 months after treatment revealed a significant difference in ozone and betahistine groups but not in the control group. When the delta (Δ) THI (the change of mean THI between the initial and 6th month) was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference. This randomized controlled study investigating the effects of ozone in tinnitus tries to shed light to a new method of treatment in tinnitus. The findings of the study does not provide enough evidence to support ozone and betahistine as a treatment for tinnitus and further research on the subject is necessary.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceBetahistineCase-Control StudiesFemaleHistamine AgonistsHumansMaleMiddle AgedOzoneProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTinnitusBetahistineHistamine AgonistsOzone

Identifiers

PMID23100082
OpenAlexW1984990526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.