Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23099799›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2013

A systematic review of communication quality improvement interventions for patients with advanced and serious illness.

Oluwakemi A Fawole, Sydney M Dy, Renee F Wilson, Brandyn D Lau, Kathryn A Martinez, Colleen C Apostol, Daniela Vollenweider, Eric B Bass, Rebecca A Aslakson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Reducing parental trauma and stress in neonatal intensive care: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospital interventions.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Family Caregivers' Characterization of Conversations Following an ACP Event.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2018
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Speaker Role Identification in Clinical Conversations.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Sex Differences in the Speech of Persons With and Without Parkinson's Disease.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Validity and Reliability of a Thai Version of Family Satisfaction with Care in the Intensive Care Unit Survey.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oluwakemi A FawoleJohns Hopkins University Evidence-Based Practice Center, 1830 East Monument Street, Room 8065, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. ofawole1@jhmi.edu
Sydney M Dy
Renee F Wilson
Brandyn D Lau
Kathryn A Martinez
Colleen C Apostol
Daniela Vollenweider
Eric B Bass
Rebecca A Aslakson
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication is an interaction between two or more people that produces a desired effect and is a key element of quality of care for patients with advanced and serious illness and their family members. Suboptimal provider-patient/family communication is common, with negative effects on patient/family-centered outcomes.

objectivesTo systematically review the evidence for effectiveness of communication-related quality improvement interventions for patients with advanced and serious illness and to explore the effectiveness of consultative and integrative interventions. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and DARE from 2000 through December 2011 and reference list of eligible articles and reviews. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA, PARTICIPANTS AND

interventionsProspective, controlled quality improvement studies in populations with life-limiting or severe life-threatening illness with a primary intervention focus of improving communication with patients and/or families. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS

methodsTwo investigators independently screened and abstracted data on patient/family-centered outcomes.

resultsWe included 20 studies; 13 (65 %) were in intensive care. We found four intervention types: (1) family meetings with the usual team (11 studies, 77 % found improvement in healthcare utilization), (2) palliative care teams (5 studies, 50 % found improvement in healthcare utilization), (3) ethics consultation (2 studies, 100 % found improvement in healthcare utilization), and (4) physician-patient communication (2 studies, no significant improvement in healthcare utilization). Among studies addressing the outcomes of patient/family satisfaction, 22 % found improvement; among studies addressing healthcare utilization (e.g., length of stay), 73 % found improvement. Results suggest that consultative interventions, as opposed to integrative ones, may be more effective, but more research is needed. LIMITATIONS: Study heterogeneity did not allow quantitative synthesis. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY

findingsCommunication in the care of patients with advanced and serious illness can be improved using quality improvement interventions, particularly for healthcare utilization as an outcome. Interventions may be more effective using a consultative approach.

Indexed as

CommunicationProfessional-Patient RelationsQuality ImprovementCritical CareDelivery of Health CareHumansPalliative CarePatient SatisfactionProfessional-Family Relations

Identifiers

PMID23099799
PMCPMC3599019
OpenAlexW2051662969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.