Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23099535›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2013

Efficient division and sampling of cell colonies using microcup arrays.

Jeng-Hao Pai, Kimberly Kluckman, Dale O Cowley, Donna M Bortner, Christopher E Sims, Nancy L Allbritton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeng-Hao PaiDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kimberly Kluckman
Dale O Cowley
Donna M Bortner
Christopher E Sims
Nancy L Allbritton

Funding

Rapid Genetic Engineering of Stem CellsR01HG004843 · NHGRI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ALLBRITTON, NANCY L. · 2009 to 2012
$2.2M
Micropallet Arrays for Separation of Single Cells and ColoniesR01EB007612 · NIBIB · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ALLBRITTON, NANCY L. · 2007 to 2010
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS HG004843NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG004843NIBIB NIH HHS EB007612NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB007612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A microengineered array to sample clonal colonies is described. The cells were cultured on an array of individually releasable elements until the colonies expanded to cover multiple elements. Single elements were released using a laser-based system and collected to sample cells from individual colonies. A greater than an 85% rate in splitting and collecting colonies was achieved using a 3-dimensional cup-like design or "microcup". Surface modification using patterned titanium deposition of the glass substrate improved the stability of microcup adhesion to the glass while enabling minimization of the laser energy for splitting the colonies. Smaller microcup dimensions and slotting the microcup walls reduced the time needed for colonies to expand into multiple microcups. The stem cell colony retained on the array and the collected fraction within released microcups remained undifferentiated and viable. The colony samples were characterized by both reporter gene expression and a destructive assay (PCR) to identify target colonies. The platform is envisioned as a means to rapidly establish cell lines using a destructive assay to identify desired clones.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Culture TechniquesCell SeparationEmbryonic Stem CellsLasersMiceMicrotechnologySingle-Cell AnalysisTime FactorsTissue Array Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23099535
PMCPMC3509232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.