Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23099524›Full record

ReviewEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2013

Animal models for scoliosis research: state of the art, current concepts and future perspective applications.

Jean Ouellet, Thierry Odent

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. New functions for the proprioceptive system in skeletal biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Kinesin family member 6 (kif6) is necessary for spine development in zebrafish.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean OuelletMcGill Scoliosis and Spinal Research Chair, Deputy Chief Shriners Hospital, Montreal, Canada. jean.ouellet@Muhc.mcgill.com
Thierry Odent
Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRMcGill University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to provide the readers with a reliable source of animal models currently being utilized to perform state-of-the-art scoliotic research. MATERIALS AND

methodsA comprehensive search was undertaken to review all publications on animal models for the study of scoliosis within the database from 1946 to January 2011.

resultsThe animal models have been grouped under specific headings reflecting the underlying pathophysiology behind the development of the spinal deformities produced in the animals: genetics, neuroendocrine, neuromuscular, external constraints, internal constraints with or without tissue injury, vertebral growth modulation and iatrogenic congenital malformations, in an attempt to organize and classify these multiple scoliotic animal models. As it stands, there are no animal models that mimic the human spinal anatomy with all its constraints and weaknesses, which puts it at risk of developing scoliosis. What we do have are a multitude of models, which produce spinal deformities that come close to the idiopathic scoliosis deformity.

conclusionAll these different animal models compel us to believe that the clinical phenotype of what we call idiopathic scoliosis may well be caused by a variety of different underlying pathologies.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsScoliosis

Identifiers

PMID23099524
PMCPMC3616476
OpenAlexW2043240502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.