Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23098364›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2013

Effectiveness of trivalent and monovalent influenza vaccines against laboratory-confirmed influenza infection in persons with medically attended influenza-like illness in Bavaria, Germany, 2010/2011 season.

H Englund, H Campe, W Hautmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

H EnglundBavarian Health and Food Safety Authority, Oberschleißheim, Germany. helene.englund@smi.se
H Campe
W Hautmann
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimated the vaccine effectiveness (VE) of trivalent and monovalent influenza vaccines,respectively, against laboratory-confirmed influenza infections in patients with influenza-likeillness who visited physicians participating in the Bayern Influenza Sentinel in Bavaria, Germany during 2010/2011. Swab specimens were analysed for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3) andB by PCR. VE was estimated using the test-negative case-control study design and logistic regression. In total, 1866 patients (790 cases, 1076 controls) were included. The VE of trivalentvaccines administered in season 2010/2011 against laboratory-confirmed infection with any influenza virus, adjusted for age group, sex, chronic illness and week of arrival of the specimen,was 67.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 39.2–82.9)]. The adjusted VE of monovalent influenza vaccines administered in season 2009/2010 against laboratory-confirmed influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection in 2010/2011 was 38.6% (95% CI x 70.0 to 77 . 8). This is the first VE study conducted in Bavaria. We concluded that the trivalent influenza vaccines were effective in our study population

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGermanyHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfluenza A virusInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleInfluenza Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID23098364
PMCPMC9151402
OpenAlexW2161172845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.