Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23098323›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2012

Storage and persistence of a candidate fungal biopesticide for use against adult malaria vectors.

Simon Blanford, Nina E Jenkins, Riann Christian, Brian H K Chan, Luisa Nardini, Michael Osae, Lizette Koekemoer, Maureen Coetzee, Andrew F Read, Matthew B Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Water is a preservative of microbes.Microbial biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Extensive Resistance ofThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon BlanfordCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Penn State University, Department of Biology, Mueller Laboratory, University Park, PA 16802, USA. stb13@psu.edu
Nina E Jenkins
Riann Christian
Brian H K Chan
Luisa Nardini
Michael Osae
Lizette Koekemoer
Maureen Coetzee
Andrew F Read
Matthew B Thomas
University of the Witwatersrand · ZANational Institute for Communicable DiseasesPennsylvania State University · USCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · USFogarty International Center · US

Funding

Existing malaria control insecticides - without the evolution of insecticide-resiR21AI088094 · NIAID · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI READ, ANDREW F. · 2010 to 2011
$388k
NIAID NIH HHS AI088094-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew products aimed at augmenting or replacing chemical insecticides must have operational profiles that include both high efficacy in reducing vector numbers and/or blocking parasite transmission and be long lasting following application. Research aimed at developing fungal spores as a biopesticide for vector control have shown considerable potential yet have not been directly assessed for their viability after long-term storage or following application in the field.

methodsSpores from a single production run of the entomopathogenic fungi Beauveria bassiana were dried and then stored under refrigeration at 7°C. After 585 days these spores were sub-sampled and placed at either 22°C, 26°C or 32°C still sealed in packaging (closed storage) or in open beakers and exposed to the 80% relative humidity of the incubator they were kept in. Samples were subsequently taken from these treatments over a further 165 days to assess viability. Spores from the same production run were also used to test their persistence following application to three different substrates, clay, cement and wood, using a hand held sprayer. The experiments were conducted at two different institutes with one using adult female Anopheles stephensi and the other adult female Anopheles gambiae. Mosquitoes were exposed to the treated substrates for one hour before being removed and their survival monitored for the next 14 days. Assays were performed at monthly intervals over a maximum seven months.

resultsSpore storage under refrigeration resulted in no loss of spore viability over more than two years. Spore viability of those samples kept under open and closed storage was highly dependent on the incubation temperature with higher temperatures decreasing viability more rapidly than cooler temperatures. Mosquito survival following exposure was dependent on substrate type. Spore persistence on the clay substrate was greatest achieving 80% population reduction for four months against An. stephensi and for at least five months against Anopheles gambiae. Cement and wood substrates had more variable mortality with the highest spore persistence being two to three months for the two substrates respectively.

conclusionsSpore shelf-life under refrigeration surpassed the standard two year shelf-life expected of a mosquito control product. Removal to a variety of temperatures under either closed or open storage indicated that samples sent out from refrigeration should be deployed rapidly in control operations to avoid loss of viability. Spore persistence following application onto clay surfaces was comparable to a number of chemical insecticides in common use. Persistence on cement and wood was shorter but in one assay still comparable to some organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides. Optimized formulations could be expected to improve spore persistence still further.

Indexed as

Microbial ViabilityAnimalsAnophelesBeauveriaDesiccationDrug StorageFemaleInsecticidesPest Control, BiologicalSpores, FungalSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsInsecticides

Identifiers

PMID23098323
PMCPMC3506477
OpenAlexW2137384130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.