Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23098128›Full record

ArticleChemistry Central journal2012

Design of optimal solvent for extraction of bio-active ingredients from six varieties of Medicago sativa.

Angela Caunii, George Pribac, Ioana Grozea, Dorin Gaitin, Ionel Samfira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemistry Central journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Comparative Analysis of Polyphenol-Rich Extracts fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Alfalfa/Lucerne (Polymers · 2024
    Article
  5. Green Synthesis and Characterization of Silver Nanoparticles UsingInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Effects ofScientific reports · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Assessment of the antidiabetic potential of extract and novel phytoniosomes formulation of Tradescantia pallida leaves in the alloxan-induced diabetic mouse model.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  10. ACS omega · 2022
    Article
  11. Response ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Antioxidant Activity and Cytotoxicity ofBioResearch open access · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angela CauniiPlant Protection Department, Grassland Department, Banat's University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine from Timisoara, Calea Aradului no, 119, Timisoara, 300645, Romania. samfiraionel@yahoo.ro.
George Pribac
Ioana Grozea
Dorin Gaitin
Ionel Samfira

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelled

backgroundExtensive research has been performed worldwide and important evidences were collected to show the immense potential of plants used in various traditional therapeutic systems. The aim of this work is to investigate the different extracting solvents in terms of the influence of their polarity on the extracting ability of bioactive molecules (phenolic compounds) from the M. sativa flowers.

resultsThe total phenolic content of samples was determined using the Folin Ciocalteu (FC) procedure and their antioxidant activity was assayed through in vitro radical decomposing activity using the radical DPPH° assay (IUPAC name for DPPH is (phenyl)-(2,4,6-trinitrophenyl) iminoazanium). The results showed that water was better than methanol and acetic acid for extracting bioactive compounds, in particular for total phenolic compounds from the flowers of alfalfa. The average content of bioactive molecules in methanol extract was 263.5±1.02 mg GAE/100g of dry weight lyophilized extract. The total phenolic content of the tested plant extracts was highly correlated with the radical decomposing activity. However, all extracts were free-radical inhibitors, but the water extract was more potent than the acetic and the methanol ones. The order of inhibitor effectiveness (expressed by IC50) proved to be: water extract (0.924mg/mL) > acetic acid extract (0.154mg/mL) > methanol (0.079mg/mL). The profiles of each extract (fingerprint) were characterized by FT-MIR spectroscopy.

conclusionsThe present study compares the fingerprint of different extracts of the M. sativa flowers, collected from the wild flora of Romania. The total phenolic content of the tested plant extracts was highly correlated with the radical decomposing activity. The dependence of the extract composition on the solvent polarity (acetic acid vs. methanol vs. water) was revealed by UV-VIS spectrometry and Infrared fingerprint.

Identifiers

PMID23098128
PMCPMC3495705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.