Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23098093›Full record

ReviewBMC medicine2012

Preclinical Alzheimer disease: identification of cases at risk among cognitively intact older individuals.

Maciej J Lazarczyk, Patrick R Hof, Constantin Bouras, Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02835716 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Pre-Clinical Alzheimer's (ALZ) Diagnosis (PCD) = Optimum Outcomes (OO)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMillennium Magnetic Technologies, LLCRan2016 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsroflumilast, ustekinumab
NCT02843529 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Computerized Complex Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Marker (NMI) as a Pre-Clinical or Pro-Dromal Alzheimers Diagnosis (Prognosis) for Optimum Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorAltoidaRan2016 to 2020Enrolled548ConditionsAlzheimer Disease, Mild Cognitive Impairment, Memory Disorders, Cognitive ImpairmentArmsAltoida: neuropsychological, MRI, EEG and CSF biomarkers
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. When Does Alzheimer's Disease Really Start? The Role of Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Preclinical Alzheimer's disease: Definition, natural history, and diagnostic criteria.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2016
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maciej J LazarczykDepartment of Mental Health and Psychiatry, University Hospitals of Geneva and Faculty of Medicine of the University of Geneva, 1225 Geneva, Switzerland.
Patrick R Hof
Constantin Bouras
Panteleimon Giannakopoulos

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the first description of the case of Auguste Deter, presented in Tübingen in 1906 by Alois Alzheimer, there has been an exponential increase in our knowledge of the neuropathological, cellular, and molecular foundation of Alzheimer's disease (AD). The concept of AD pathogenesis has evolved from a static, binary view discriminating cognitive normality from dementia, towards a dynamic view that considers AD pathology as a long-lasting morbid process that takes place progressively over years, or even decades, before the first symptoms become apparent, and thus operating in a continuum between the two aforementioned extreme states. Several biomarkers have been proposed to predict AD-related cognitive decline, initially in cases with mild cognitive impairment, and more recently in cognitively intact individuals. These early markers define at-risk individuals thought to be in the preclinical phase of AD. However, the clinical relevance of this preclinical phase remains controversial. The fate of such individuals, who are cognitively intact, but positive for some early AD biomarkers, is currently uncertain at best. In this report, we advocate the point of view that although most of these preclinical cases will evolve to clinically overt AD, some appear to have efficient compensatory mechanisms and virtually never develop dementia. We critically review the currently available early AD markers, discuss their clinical relevance, and propose a novel classification of preclinical AD, designating these non-progressing cases as 'stable asymptomatic cerebral amyloidosis'.

Indexed as

Asymptomatic DiseasesAlzheimer DiseaseBiomarkersCerebral Amyloid AngiopathyDementiaHumansRisk AssessmentBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID23098093
PMCPMC3523068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.