Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23097257›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2012

Assessment of changes in risk behaviors during 3 years of posttrial follow-up of male circumcision trial participants uncircumcised at trial closure in Rakai, Uganda.

Xiangrong Kong, Godfrey Kigozi, Fred Nalugoda, Richard Musoke, Joseph Kagaayi, Carl Latkin, Robert Ssekubugu, Tom Lutalo, Betty Nantume, Iga Boaz and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Effectiveness of Voluntary Medical Male Circumcision for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Prevention in Rakai, Uganda.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangrong KongJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 627 North Washington Street, Room 2C, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. xikong@jhsph.edu
Godfrey Kigozi
Fred Nalugoda
Richard Musoke
Joseph Kagaayi
Carl Latkin
Robert Ssekubugu
Tom Lutalo
Betty Nantume
Iga Boaz
Maria Wawer
David Serwadda
Ronald Gray
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Circumcision: HIV/STIs and behaviors in a RCT and post-RCT surveillance; RakaiU01AI075115 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, RONALD H · 2007 to 2011
$9.3M
Male Circumcision Trial for HIV Prevention, Rakai-UgandaU01AI051171 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GRAY, RONALD H · 2002 to 2006
$8.9M
NIAID NIH HHS 1UO1AI075115-O1A1NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI051171NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075115NIAID NIH HHS U1AI51171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk compensation associated with male circumcision has been a concern for male circumcision scale-up programs. Using posttrial data collected during 2007-2011 on 2,137 male circumcision trial participants who were uncircumcised at trial closure in Rakai, Uganda, the authors evaluated their sexual behavioral changes during approximately 3 years' follow-up after trial closure. Eighty-one percent of the men self-selected for male circumcision during the period, and their sociodemographic and risk profiles were comparable to those of men remaining uncircumcised. Linear models for marginal probabilities of repeated outcomes estimate that 3.3% (P < 0.0001) of the male circumcision acceptors reduced their engagement in nonmarital relations, whereas there was no significant change among men remaining uncircumcised. Significant decreases in condom use occurred in both male circumcision acceptors (-9.2% with all partners and -7.0% with nonmarital partners) and nonacceptors (-12.4% and -13.5%, respectively), and these were predominantly among younger men. However, the magnitudes of decrease in condom use were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Additionally, significant decreases in sex-related alcohol consumption were observed in both groups (-7.8% in male circumcision acceptors and -6.1% in nonacceptors), mainly among older men. In summary, there was no evidence of risk compensation associated with male circumcision among this cohort of men during 3 years of posttrial follow-up.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlcohol DrinkingCircumcision, MaleCondomsFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSexual BehaviorUgandaUnsafe SexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID23097257
PMCPMC3626062
OpenAlexW2131850100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.