ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery2012
Reconstruction of proper digital nerve defects in the thumb using a pedicle nerve graft.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment options for digital nerve injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Sensory Outcomes in Digital Nerve Repair Techniques: An Updated Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2020Pooled it
- Harnessing spatiotemporal melatonin delivery from engineered platforms for targeted microenvironment remodeling in peripheral neuropathy.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- The Role of Vascularized Nerve Grafting in Upper Extremity Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Article
- Long-term sensibility outcomes of secondary digital nerve reconstruction with sural nerve autografts: a retrospective study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2022Article
- Donor nerve graft assessment for covering thumb nerve defects: a cadaveric study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraumatic defects of the proper digital nerve in the thumb affect tactile perception of the thumb pulp. This article reports on the treatment of the defect using a pedicle nerve graft taken from the dorsal branch of the proper digital nerve of the index or long finger, or both.
methodsFrom May of 2006 to March of 2010, the pedicle nerve graft was used in 16 thumbs in 16 patients. There were 13 male and three female patients, with an average age of 33 years. Nerve repair was performed on one side in six thumbs and on both sides in 10 thumbs. The average length of the defects was 2.5 cm, between the middle of the distal phalanx and metacarpophalangeal joint. The average length of the nerve grafts was 2.7 cm. For comparison, we also collected a consecutive series of 27 patients with thumb proper digital nerve defects treated using a nonvascularized graft taken from the sural nerve (n = 15) or the medial antebrachial cutaneous nerve (n = 12).
resultsAt a mean follow-up of 22 months, the mean static two-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament scores on the thumb pulps were 6.7 mm and 3.62, respectively. The measurements of patients treated using nonvascularized nerve grafts were 9.4 mm and 3.90, respectively. The outcomes of the two groups were significantly different.
conclusionsThe pedicle nerve graft is useful and reliable for reconstructing proper digital nerve defects in the thumb. Superior sensory recovery was achieved using vascularized instead of unvascularized nerve grafts. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.