Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23096485›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2013

How to manage hyperglycemia in an acute coronary syndrome patient.

David Vivas, Esther Bernardo, Julian Palacios-Rubio, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

David VivasInstituto Cardiovascular, Hospital Universitario San Carlos, Profesor Martin Lagos, s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Esther Bernardo
Julian Palacios-Rubio
Antonio Fernández-Ortiz
Hospital Clínico San Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementEvidences on hyperglycemia management in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are scarce and controversial. While approaches such as infusion of glucose, insulin, and potassium (GIK therapy) have not demonstrated any improvement in outcome, glycemic control by means of either continuous insulin infusion or subcutaneous on-demand boluses may be useful only when glycaemia is successfully controlled. Nevertheless, results from several studies are controversial and there is no consensus on glycaemia target values. Concerning oral antidiabetic treatment, previous reports stated an increase in heart attacks throughout their chronic use, however no studies have addressed the effects of either starting or continuing oral antidiabetics during ACS setting. Therefore, there is not enough evidence to strongly recommend any specific therapy to manage hyperglycemia in an ACS patient other than trying to keep glycaemia within reasonable levels (usually defined by consensus), and there is evidence discouraging the use of GIK therapy since no beneficial effect has been observed.

Identifiers

PMID23096485
OpenAlexW2038226938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.