Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23095413›Full record

ReviewBlood purification2012

Pediatric renal replacement therapy in the intensive care unit.

Brian C Bridges, David J Askenazi, Jessimene Smith, Stuart L Goldstein

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood purification, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Neonatal continuous kidney replacement therapy.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sedative and Analgesic Pharmacokinetics During Pediatric ECMO.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020
    Review
  11. Modification of Nutrition Therapy During Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: A Narrative Review and Recommendations.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brian C BridgesDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232-9075, USA. brian.c.bridges@vanderbilt.edu
David J Askenazi
Jessimene Smith
Stuart L Goldstein
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

UAB-UCSD O'Brien Core Center for Acute Kidney Injury ResearchP30DK079337 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI AGARWAL, ANUPAM · 2008 to 2022
$18.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is used in a wide variety of pediatric populations. In this article, we will review the advantages and disadvantages of the different RRT modalities and the technical aspects of providing pediatric RRT. In addition, we will review the use of RRT with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the use of continuous RRT in the critically ill child with acute kidney injury and fluid overload, and the use of RRT for the removal of toxins and treatment of inborn errors of metabolism.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryChildCritical IllnessEquipment DesignExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationHumansIntensive Care UnitsMetabolism, Inborn ErrorsRenal Replacement Therapy

Identifiers

PMID23095413
PMCPMC5545793
OpenAlexW2054106269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.