ReviewInternational wound journal2013
Bioengineered skin substitutes: key elements and novel design for biomedical applications.
Review in International wound journal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidics, 3D bioprinted scaffold and organ-on-chip with biosensing activated therapeutic strategies for diabetic wound healing.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Blood Plasma, Fibrinogen or Fibrin Biomaterial for the Manufacturing of Skin Tissue-Engineered Products and Other Dermatological Treatments: A Systematic Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Future applications of 3D bioprinting: A promising technology for treating recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.Experimental dermatology · 2022Article
- A suspended layer additive manufacturing approach to the bioprinting of tri-layered skin equivalents.APL bioengineering · 2021Article
- Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the emerging therapeutic approach.Cell and tissue research · 2021Review
- Bioengineered Skin Intended for Skin Disease Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Annexin A1Frontiers in pharmacology · 2018Article
- Article
- Recent accomplishments in wound healing.International wound journal · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in the development of in vitro-engineered skin substitutes that mimic human skin, either to be used for the replacement of lost skin or for the establishment of in vitro skin research models. However, at the present time, there are no models of bioengineered skin that completely replicate the nature of uninjured skin. Obviously, there is still much room for improvement of the components of bioengineered skin and their interplay. This review summarises the important new discoveries in key elements of engineering of tissue-engineered skin including cell sources, biomaterials and growth factors, etc. Furthermore, basic and clinical applications for engineered skin substitutes in cell therapy, tissue engineering, and biomedical research continue to drive design improvements premised on these structure and function-based engineering paradigms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.