Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23094689›Full record

ArticleAllergy2012

IgE, but not IgG4, antibodies to Ara h 2 distinguish peanut allergy from asymptomatic peanut sensitization.

X Hong, D Caruso, R Kumar, R Liu, X Liu, G Wang, J A Pongracic, X Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Allergy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Utility of component analyses in subjects undergoing sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2016
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Food Allergy in South Africa.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2017
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Applications of Molecular Diagnostic Testing in Food Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

X HongCenter on the Early Life Origins of Disease, Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA. xhong@jhsph.edu
D Caruso
R Kumar
R Liu
X Liu
G Wang
J A Pongracic
X Wang
Johns Hopkins University · USLurie Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science (MCTS) Program (KL2)KL2RR025740 · NCRR · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GREENLAND, PHILIP · 2008 to 2011
$2.8M
Post Genome-Wide Association Study of Food AllergyU01AI090727 · NIAID · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI WANG, XIAOBIN · 2010 to 2014
$2.3M
Role of Prenatal Factors and Gene-Environment Interactions in Recurrent WheezingK23HL093023 · NHLBI · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI KUMAR, RAJESH · 2008 to 2012
$672k
Epigenome Association Study of Food AllergyR21AI088609 · NIAID · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI WANG, XIAOBIN · 2010 to 2011
$409k
Vitamin D and Food Allergy: a Prospective Birth Cohort StudyR21AI087888 · NIAID · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI LIU, XIN · 2010 to 2011
$402k
NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR025740NCRR NIH HHS KL2RR025740NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL093023NHLBI NIH HHS K23HL093023NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI087888NIAID NIH HHS R21AI087888NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI088609NIAID NIH HHS R21AI088609NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI090727NIAID NIH HHS U01AI090727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no available clinical tests that can accurately predict peanut allergy (PA) and/or anaphylaxis. This study is aimed at evaluating whether the component-resolved diagnostic (CRD) IgE and IgG4 tests can (i) distinguish PA from asymptomatic peanut sensitization (PS) and (ii) differentiate anaphylactic from nonanaphylactic PA.

methodsThis study included 20 nonatopic controls, 58 asymptomatically peanut-sensitized children, 55 nonanaphylactic, and 53 anaphylactic PA cases from the Chicago Food Allergy Study. IgE and IgG4 to 103 allergens were measured using the ImmunoCAP ISAC technology and were compared among each group of children. The random forest test was applied to estimate each allergen's ability to predict PA and/or peanut anaphylaxis.

resultsPeanut allergy cases (with or without anaphylaxis) had significantly higher IgE reactivity to Ara h 1-3 (peanut allergens) and Gly m 5-6 (soy allergens) than asymptomatically sensitized children (P < 0.00001). Similar but more modest relationships were found for IgG4 to Ara h 2 (P < 0.01). IgE to Ara h 2 was the major contributor to accurate discrimination between PA and asymptomatic sensitization. With an optimal cutoff point of 0.65 ISU-E, it conferred 99.1% sensitivity, 98.3% specificity, and a 1.2% misclassification rate in the prediction of PA, which represented a higher discriminative accuracy than IgE to whole peanut extract (P = 0.008). However, none of the IgE and/or IgG4 tests could significantly differentiate peanut anaphylaxis from nonanaphylactic PA.

conclusionsIgE to Ara h 2 can efficiently differentiate clinical PA from asymptomatic PS, which may represent a major step forward in the diagnosis of PA.

Indexed as

2S Albumins, PlantAdolescentAllergensAntibody SpecificityAntigens, PlantChildChild, PreschoolCross ReactionsFemaleGlycoproteinsHumansImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin GMalePeanut HypersensitivityProtein Binding2S Albumins, PlantAllergensAntigens, PlantAra h 2 allergen, Arachis hypogaeaGlycoproteinsImmunoglobulin EImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID23094689
PMCPMC3499645
OpenAlexW2087355199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.