Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23094678›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2013

Effect of predictive cuing on response inhibition in children with heavy prenatal alcohol exposure.

Jessica W O'Brien, Andria L Norman, Susanna L Fryer, Susan F Tapert, Martin P Paulus, Kenneth Lyons Jones, Edward P Riley, Sarah N Mattson

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders: Recent Neuroimaging Findings.Current developmental disorders reports · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica W O'BrienDepartment of Psychology, Center for Behavioral Teratology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92120, USA.
Andria L Norman
Susanna L Fryer
Susan F Tapert
Martin P Paulus
Kenneth Lyons Jones
Edward P Riley
Sarah N Mattson

Funding

Cross-Cultural Assessment of FASDU24AA014811 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EDWARD P RILEY · 2003 to 2026
$13.1M
FASD in San Diego and Moscow (U01 Research Project)U01AA014834 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SARAH N MATTSON WELLER · 2003 to 2026
$12.4M
Behavioral &MRI Evaluation of Prenatal Alcohol ExposureR01AA010417 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RILEY, EDWARD P · 1995 to 2010
$4.3M
Mechanisms of Attention Deficits in Children with Heavy Prenatal Alcohol ExposureR01AA019605 · NIAAA · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MATTSON WELLER, SARAH N · 2010 to 2012
$1.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA010417NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019605NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA014834NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA014811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHeavy prenatal exposure to alcohol leads to widespread cognitive deficits, including problems with attention and response inhibition. This study examined blood oxygen level-dependent response in children with and without histories of heavy prenatal alcohol exposure during a task of response inhibition consisting of cued and noncued trials.

methodsChildren and adolescents (ages 8 to 18 years) with (alcohol-exposed [AE] = 20) and without (control [CON] = 15) histories of heavy prenatal exposure to alcohol underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging while performing a go/no-go task. Unbeknownst to subjects, a predictive cue preceded the no-go stimulus in 87% of trials.

resultsGroups were matched on demographic variables and did not differ on most measures of task performance. However, following cued stimuli, the AE group demonstrated a lower hit rate to go stimuli and more conservative response bias than the CON group. AE participants demonstrated more activation during no-go trials (inhibition) relative to go trials in the left precuneus, cingulate gyrus, anterior cingulate, and right medial frontal gyrus. During cue-dependent response inhibition, the AE group demonstrated less activation in the left precentral and postcentral gyrus compared to the CON group.

conclusionsConsistent with previous studies of response inhibition, the AE group demonstrated greater frontal and parietal activation when attempting to inhibit prepotent responses than the CON group, despite similar rates of commission errors. This study further demonstrated that the AE group had impaired behavioral performance on cued trials and demonstrated less activation in precentral and postcentral gyri relative to the CON group on these trials. This investigation provides evidence of impaired behavioral and neural processing of sequential information in fetal alcohol spectrum disorders, which can help improve inhibition in typical populations.

Indexed as

CuesInhibition, PsychologicalAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingChildFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsPsychomotor PerformanceReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID23094678
PMCPMC3771541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.