Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23094002›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2012

Current status of epibulbar anti-glaucoma drainage devices in glaucoma surgery.

Hagen Thieme

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hagen ThiemeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. hagen.thieme@med.ovgu.de
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe term "glaucoma" covers a heterogeneous group of progressive optic neuropathies that are accompanied by characteristic visual-field defects. Primary open-angle glaucoma, the most common type, progresses insidiously and causes blindness if untreated. All current forms of treatment aim at lowering the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients whose IOP is elevated. The implantation of anti-glaucoma drainage systems is one of the available options for surgical treatment.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent literature retrieved by a selective search, including glaucoma treatment guidelines from Germany and abroad.

resultsA paradigm shift is currently underway regarding the indications for the implantation of anti-glaucoma drainage systems. Trabeculectomy (a "fistulating" operation in which the aqueous humor is led out of the eye under the conjunctiva) is still considered the surgical gold standard, but drainage systems have been implanted with increasing frequency in recent years. Studies have shown that these systems are more likely to be beneficial the earlier they are implanted in the course of the patient's disease. Five-year follow-up data from the randomized, multicenter Tube Versus Trabeculectomy (TVT) study have now revealed that anti-glaucoma drainage systems are equivalent to trabeculectomy with respect to long-term IOP reduction, complication rates, and absolute and relative clinical success rates.

conclusionGlaucoma is a major clinical and socio-economic problem whose surgical treatment increasingly involves the implantation of anti-glaucoma drainage systems.

Indexed as

Glaucoma Drainage ImplantsFollow-Up StudiesGermanyGlaucoma, Open-AngleHumansIntraocular PressurePostoperative ComplicationsPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTrabeculectomy

Identifiers

PMID23094002
PMCPMC3476613
OpenAlexW2096962289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.