Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23093942›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2012

Recovery of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone.

Ismail Iraqui, Yasmina Chekkal, Nada Jmari, Violena Pietrobon, Karine Fréon, Audrey Costes, Sarah A E Lambert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. POLD3 as Controller of Replicative DNA Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. eLife · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Creation and resolution of non-B-DNA structural impediments during replication.Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A rapidly reversible mutation generates subclonal genetic diversity and unstable drug resistance.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ismail IraquiInstitut Curie, Centre de Recherche, Orsay, France.
Yasmina Chekkal
Nada Jmari
Violena Pietrobon
Karine Fréon
Audrey Costes
Sarah A E Lambert
Institut Curie · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination is a universal mechanism that allows repair of DNA and provides support for DNA replication. Homologous recombination is therefore a major pathway that suppresses non-homology-mediated genome instability. Here, we report that recovery of impeded replication forks by homologous recombination is error-prone. Using a fork-arrest-based assay in fission yeast, we demonstrate that a single collapsed fork can cause mutations and large-scale genomic changes, including deletions and translocations. Fork-arrest-induced gross chromosomal rearrangements are mediated by inappropriate ectopic recombination events at the site of collapsed forks. Inverted repeats near the site of fork collapse stimulate large-scale genomic changes up to 1,500 times over spontaneous events. We also show that the high accuracy of DNA replication during S-phase is impaired by impediments to fork progression, since fork-arrest-induced mutation is due to erroneous DNA synthesis during recovery of replication forks. The mutations caused are small insertions/duplications between short tandem repeats (micro-homology) indicative of replication slippage. Our data establish that collapsed forks, but not stalled forks, recovered by homologous recombination are prone to replication slippage. The inaccuracy of DNA synthesis does not rely on PCNA ubiquitination or trans-lesion-synthesis DNA polymerases, and it is not counteracted by mismatch repair. We propose that deletions/insertions, mediated by micro-homology, leading to copy number variations during replication stress may arise by progression of error-prone replication forks restarted by homologous recombination.

Indexed as

DNA RepairDNA ReplicationHomologous RecombinationChromosome AberrationsDNA HelicasesDNA Mismatch RepairGene OrderGenomic InstabilityInverted Repeat SequencesMutationRecQ HelicasesRNA-Binding Protein FUSSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranslocation, GeneticDNA HelicasesRecQ HelicasesRNA-Binding Protein FUSRqh1 protein, S pombeSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23093942
PMCPMC3475662
OpenAlexW1997854301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.