ArticlePLoS computational biology2012
Phasic firing in vasopressin cells: understanding its functional significance through computational models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modelling vasopressin synthesis and storage dynamics during prolonged osmotic challenge and recovery based on activity dependent upregulation of mRNA transcription.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Cellular mechanisms of long-term osmoregulation in magnocellular neurons.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2025Review
- Reduced osmoresponsiveness in magnocellular neuroendocrine neurones during chronic salt-loading.The Journal of physiology · 2025Article
- An unbiased method to partition diverse neuronal responses into functional ensembles reveals interpretable population dynamics during innate social behavior.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Measuring oxytocin release in response to gavage: Computational modelling and assay validation.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2023Article
- Mathematical modelling of the oxytocin and vasopressin secretory system.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2022Review
- Phasic spiking in vasopressin neurons: How and Why.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2021Review
- Nitric oxide resets kisspeptin-excited GnRH neurons via PIP2 replenishment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- Phasic Neuronal Firing in the Rodent Nucleus of the Solitary TractFrontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Emergent decision-making behaviour and rhythm generation in a computational model of the ventromedial nucleus of the hypothalamus.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Heterogeneity of Calcium Responses to Secretagogues in Corticotrophs From Male Rats.Endocrinology · 2017Article
- Spike patterning in oxytocin neurons: Capturing physiological behaviour with Hodgkin-Huxley and integrate-and-fire models.PloS one · 2017Article
- Oxytocin Neurones: Intrinsic Mechanisms Governing the Regularity of Spiking Activity.Journal of neuroendocrinology · 2016Article
- Modulation of spike clustering by NMDA receptors and neurotensin in rat supraoptic nucleus neurons.The Journal of physiology · 2014Article
- Transient and sustained afterdepolarizations in accessory olfactory bulb mitral cells are mediated by distinct mechanisms that are differentially regulated by neuromodulators.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2014Article
- Information coding in vasopressin neurons--the role of asynchronous bistable burst firing.Bio Systems · 2013Article
- Spike triggered hormone secretion in vasopressin cells; a model investigation of mechanism and heterogeneous population function.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vasopressin neurons, responding to input generated by osmotic pressure, use an intrinsic mechanism to shift from slow irregular firing to a distinct phasic pattern, consisting of long bursts and silences lasting tens of seconds. With increased input, bursts lengthen, eventually shifting to continuous firing. The phasic activity remains asynchronous across the cells and is not reflected in the population output signal. Here we have used a computational vasopressin neuron model to investigate the functional significance of the phasic firing pattern. We generated a concise model of the synaptic input driven spike firing mechanism that gives a close quantitative match to vasopressin neuron spike activity recorded in vivo, tested against endogenous activity and experimental interventions. The integrate-and-fire based model provides a simple physiological explanation of the phasic firing mechanism involving an activity-dependent slow depolarising afterpotential (DAP) generated by a calcium-inactivated potassium leak current. This is modulated by the slower, opposing, action of activity-dependent dendritic dynorphin release, which inactivates the DAP, the opposing effects generating successive periods of bursting and silence. Model cells are not spontaneously active, but fire when perturbed by random perturbations mimicking synaptic input. We constructed one population of such phasic neurons, and another population of similar cells but which lacked the ability to fire phasically. We then studied how these two populations differed in the way that they encoded changes in afferent inputs. By comparison with the non-phasic population, the phasic population responds linearly to increases in tonic synaptic input. Non-phasic cells respond to transient elevations in synaptic input in a way that strongly depends on background activity levels, phasic cells in a way that is independent of background levels, and show a similar strong linearization of the response. These findings show large differences in information coding between the populations, and apparent functional advantages of asynchronous phasic firing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.