ArticleNucleic acids research2013
MuMoD: a Bayesian approach to detect multiple modes of protein-DNA binding from genome-wide ChIP data.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying promoter sequence architectures via a chunking-based algorithm using non-negative matrix factorisation.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- A universal framework for detectingGenome research · 2021Article
- Resolving diverse protein-DNA footprints from exonuclease-based ChIP experiments.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2021Article
- Disentangling transcription factor binding site complexity.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- DIVERSITY in binding, regulation, and evolution revealed from high-throughput ChIP.PLoS computational biology · 2018Article
- THiCweed: fast, sensitive detection of sequence features by clustering big datasets.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- Parametric bootstrapping for biological sequence motifs.BMC bioinformatics · 2016Article
- Genome-wide mapping of matrix attachment regions in Drosophila melanogaster.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Multiple novel promoter-architectures revealed by decoding the hidden heterogeneity within the genome.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- CollecTF: a database of experimentally validated transcription factor-binding sites in Bacteria.Nucleic acids research · 2014Article
- Models incorporating chromatin modification data identify functionally important p53 binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
High-throughput chromatin immunoprecipitation has become the method of choice for identifying genomic regions bound by a protein. Such regions are then investigated for overrepresented sequence motifs, the assumption being that they must correspond to the binding specificity of the profiled protein. However this approach often fails: many bound regions do not contain the 'expected' motif. This is because binding DNA directly at its recognition site is not the only way the protein can cause the region to immunoprecipitate. Its binding specificity can change through association with different co-factors, it can bind DNA indirectly, through intermediaries, or even enforce its function through long-range chromosomal interactions. Conventional motif discovery methods, though largely capable of identifying overrepresented motifs from bound regions, lack the ability to characterize such diverse modes of protein-DNA binding and binding specificities. We present a novel Bayesian method that identifies distinct protein-DNA binding mechanisms without relying on any motif database. The method successfully identifies co-factors of proteins that do not bind DNA directly, such as mediator and p300. It also predicts literature-supported enhancer-promoter interactions. Even for well-studied direct-binding proteins, this method provides compelling evidence for previously uncharacterized dependencies within positions of binding sites, long-range chromosomal interactions and dimerization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.