ReviewNeuroRehabilitation2012
Neuroimaging after critical illness: implications for neurorehabilitation outcome.
Review in NeuroRehabilitation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health-related quality of life, physical and mental capacity at one year follow up of COVID-19 ICU patients: A prospective cohort study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Patients Surviving Critical COVID-19 have Impairments in Dual-task Performance Related to Post-intensive Care Syndrome.Journal of intensive care medicine · 2022Observational
- Brain MRI after critical care admission: A longitudinal imaging study.Journal of critical care · 2021Article
- Evolution of Cerebral Atrophy in a Patient with Super Refractory Status Epilepticus Treated with Barbiturate Coma.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2017Article
- Functional brain imaging in survivors of critical illness: A prospective feasibility study and exploration of the association between delirium and brain activation patterns.Journal of critical care · 2015Article
- Myalgic Encephalomyelitis: Symptoms and Biomarkers.Current neuropharmacology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Survivors of critical illness frequently have severe and long-lasting cognitive impairments and psychiatric disorders, which adversely affect functional outcomes including return to work, and quality of life. While data regarding cognitive outcomes has increased over the last 15 years, neuroimaging data in medical and surgical critical populations is extremely limited. The abrupt development of new significant cognitive impairments after critical illness along with abnormalities on neuroimaging suggest that critical illness results in new acquired brain injury, similar to that observed in other acquired brain injuries. Abnormalities on neuroimaging including cortical and subcortical lesions, brain atrophy, and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) which occur in widely distributed brain regions. Patients admitted to neurorehabilitation who received critical care related to their primary diagnosis may have sustained neurological injury from the nonspecific effects of their critical illness and as demonstrated in this review, generalized, non-specific neuroimaging findings may be observed and quantified. Given the high prevalence rate of cognitive impairments in this population, neuroimaging is important to help elucidate neuropathology of critical illness acquired brain injury and may be beneficial in guiding rehabilitation outcomes in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.