ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2013
SHAVE: shrinkage estimator measured for multiple visits increases power in GWAS of quantitative traits.
Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A framework for conducting GWAS using repeated measures data with an application to childhood BMI.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A framework for conducting time-varying genome-wide association studies: An application to body mass index across childhood in six multiethnic cohorts.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- RETROSPECTIVE VARYING COEFFICIENT ASSOCIATION ANALYSIS OF LONGITUDINAL BINARY TRAITS: APPLICATION TO THE IDENTIFICATION OF GENETIC LOCI ASSOCIATED WITH HYPERTENSION.The annals of applied statistics · 2024Article
- Gene Region Association Analysis of Longitudinal Quantitative Traits Based on a Function-On-Function Regression Model.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Retrospective Association Analysis of Longitudinal Binary Traits Identifies Important Loci and Pathways in Cocaine Use.Genetics · 2019Article
- fGWAS: An R package for genome-wide association analysis with longitudinal phenotypes.Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao · 2018Article
- Longitudinal SNP-set association analysis of quantitative phenotypes.Genetic epidemiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Measurement error and biological variability generate distortions in quantitative phenotypic data. In longitudinal studies with repeated measurements, the multiple measurements provide a route to reduce noise and correspondingly increase the strength of signals in genome-wide association studies (GWAS).To optimize noise correction, we have developed Shrunken Average (SHAVE), an approach using a Bayesian Shrinkage estimator. This estimator uses regression toward the mean for every individual as a function of (1) their average across visits; (2) their number of visits; and (3) the correlation between visits. Computer simulations support an increase in power, with results very similar to those expected by the assumptions of the model. The method was applied to a real data set for 14 anthropomorphic traits in ∼6000 individuals enrolled in the SardiNIA project, with up to three visits (measurements) for each participant. Results show that additional measurements have a large impact on the strength of GWAS signals, especially when participants have different number of visits, with SHAVE showing a clear increase in power relative to single visits. In addition, we have derived a relation to assess the improvement in power as a function of number of visits and correlation between visits. It can also be applied in the optimization of experimental designs or usage of measuring devices. SHAVE is fast and easy to run, written in R and freely available online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.