Microbial genomics challenge Darwin.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Adapting the rhizome concept to an extended definition of viral quasispecies and the implications for molecular evolution.Scientific reports · 2024
   Article
2. Rhizomal Reclassification of Living Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
   Review
3. The concept of the hologenome, an epigenetic phenomenon, challenges aspects of the modern evolutionary synthesis.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2019
   Article
4. The Rhizome of Lokiarchaeota Illustrates the Mosaicity of Archaeal Genomes.Genome biology and evolution · 2017
   Article
5. Life and consciousness - The Vedāntic view.Communicative & integrative biology
   Article
6. Creationism and intelligent design are incompatible with scientific progress: A response to Shanta and Vêdanta.Communicative & integrative biology
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as