ArticleCancer research and treatment2012
Clinico-pathologic Parameters for Prediction of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Cancer.
Article in Cancer research and treatment, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Stromal expression of miR-21 in T3-4a colorectal cancer is an independent predictor of early tumor relapse.BMC gastroenterology · 2015Pooled it
- Predicting mechanism of immune response in microsatellite instability colorectal cancer.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Potential Mechanism of Immune Evasion Associated with the Master Regulator ASCL2 in Microsatellite Stability in Colorectal Cancer.Journal of immunology research · 2021Article
- Expression and significance of miR-654-5p and miR-376b-3p in patients with colon cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Genetic and epigenetic analysis of the beta-2-microglobulin gene in microsatellite instable colorectal cancer.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2020Article
- Concomitant occurrence of primary renal non-Hodgkin lymphoma and a colon cancer: A rare case report.Medicine · 2019Article
- Comparison of the eighth version of the American Joint Committee on Cancer manual to the seventh version for colorectal cancer: A retrospective review of our data.World journal of clinical oncology · 2018Article
- Association between clinicopathological characteristics and RAS mutation in colorectal cancer.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2018Observational
- Deficient mismatch repair andPeerJ · 2018Article
- Comparison of microsatellite status detection methods in colorectal carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018Article
- Analysis of factors influencing molecular testing at diagnostic of colorectal cancer.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- KRAS and BRAF gene mutations and DNA mismatch repair status in Chinese colorectal carcinoma patients.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Article
- AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition criteria for colon cancer: do the complex modifications improve prognostic assessment?Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAlthough the incidence of microsatellite instability (MSI) accounts for 10-15% of cases of colorectal cancer, its clinical application for all colorectal cancers has widened. We attempted to identify clinical and pathological parameters that may be helpful in selection of patients with MSI-high (MSI-H). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 120 resected colorectal cancers were enrolled retrospectively for this MSI study. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and denaturing high performance liquid chromatography and/or real time PCR methods with five markers and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MLH1 and MSH2 were performed for analysis of cancer and blood specimens. Clinico-pathologic parameters, including IHC, were investigated in order to determine their usefulness as predictive factors of MSI.
resultsAmong 120 cases of colorectal cancer, MSI was observed in 15 cases (12.5%), including 11 cases of MSI-H and four cases of MSI-low. Patients with MSI were younger, less than 50 years old, had a family history of cancer, Rt. sided colon cancer and/or synchronous multiple colorectal cancer, mucinous histologic type, and serum carcinoembryonic antigen group in the normal range. Results of multivariate analysis showed Bethesda guidelines, Rt. sided and/or synchronous multiple colorectal cancer, and negative expression of IHC for MLH1, which was consistently associated with MSI-H. MSI-H colorectal tumors have met at least one of these three parameters and their sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 72.5%, respectively.
conclusionBethesda guidelines, tumor location, and negative expression of MLH1 protein are important parameters for selection of patients with colorectal cancers for MSI testing. MSI testing is recommended for patients showing any of these three parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.