Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23090839›Full record

SynthesisNeurocritical care2014

Systematic review of efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and administration of intraventricular vancomycin in adults.

Karen Ng, Vincent H Mabasa, Ivy Chow, Mary H H Ensom

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurocritical care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The use of intraventricular vancomycin in subacute brain abscess in an adolescent male: A case report.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. COVID-19-Associated Acute Brain Dysfunction Related to Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karen NgFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Karen.Ng2@vch.ca.
Vincent H Mabasa
Ivy Chow
Mary H H Ensom
Burnaby Hospital · CAChildren's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system infections requiring treatment with intraventricular (IVT) vancomycin are becoming increasingly common with advent of intracranial devices and increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant and nosocomial organisms. Administering vancomycin via IVT route bypasses the blood-brain barrier to allow localized and controlled delivery directly to the desired site of action, achieving high concentrations for more reliable bactericidal action. This article systematically reviews current literature on IVT vancomycin in adults, compiles current knowledge, and integrates available evidence to serve as a practical reference.Medline (1946-July 2012), Embase (1974-July 2012), and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-July 2012) were searched using terms vancomycin, intraventricular, shunt infection, cerebrospinal fluid, and intraventriculitis. Seventeen articles were included in this review. Indications for IVT vancomycin included meningitis unresponsive to intravenous antibiotics, ventriculitis, and intracranial device infections. No serious adverse effects following IVT vancomycin have been reported. Dosages reported in literature ranged from 0.075-50 mg/day, with the most evidence for dosages of 5 to 20 mg/day. Duration of therapy most commonly ranged from 7 to 21 days. Therapeutic drug monitoring was reported in 11 studies, with CSF vancomycin levels varying widely from 1.1 to 812.6 mg/L, without clear relationships between CSF levels and efficacy or toxicity. Using IVT vancomycin to treat meningitis, ventriculitis, and CNS device-associated infections appears safe and effective based on current evidence. Optimal regimens are still unclear, and dosing of IVT vancomycin requires intricate consideration of patient specific factors and their impact on CNS pathophysiology. Higher-quality clinical trials are necessary to characterize the disposition of vancomycin within CNS, and to determine models for various pathophysiological conditions to facilitate better understanding of effects on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCerebral VentriculitisHumansInjections, IntraventricularMeningoencephalitisVancomycinAnti-Bacterial AgentsVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID23090839
OpenAlexW4249787195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.