ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2013
Real-life evaluation of a human immunodeficiency virus screening algorithm using a single combined p24 antigen-antibody assay.
Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in primary care among adults living in developed countries: a systematic review.Systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Risks of requiring a dedicated molecular specimen for HIV diagnosis and a potential strategy for mitigation.PloS one · 2020Article
- The characteristics of screening and confirmatory test results for HIV in Xi'an, China.PloS one · 2017Article
- Predictors of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection in primary care: a systematic review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2016Article
- Prolonged second diagnostic window for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in a fourth-generation immunoassay: are alternative testing strategies required?Journal of clinical microbiology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since May 2010, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) screening in France has been performed using a single combined fourth-generation assay. One of our major concerns is to verify that this screening strategy is able to diagnose HIV primary infection as soon as possible. Thus, the sensitivity and specificity of this strategy were evaluated on 49,623 serum samples, including 29 primary infections, received for routine HIV testing between September 2010 and November 2011. Specimens were screened using the Enzygnost HIV Integral II enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. All positive sera, according to the manufacturer's recommendations [signal-to-cutoff ratio (S/CO) ≥ 1] were retested using the Architect HIV Ag/Ab Combo. Moreover, we defined a grey zone (0.5 < S/CO < 1) and sera within this grey zone were retested using the VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra test and HIV-1 RNA was checked by the Abbott RealTime PCR kit. Screening tests were positive for all primary infections. All samples within the grey zone proved VIDAS HIV DUO Ultra and HIV-1 RNA negative. Overall, the ELISA test sensitivity and specificity were 100 and 99.79 %, respectively. The false-positive rate was higher when S/CO was in the low range (1 to 5). Adding a second screening test for positive sera reduced the false-positive rate from 0.20 to 0.02 %. HIV screening with a single combined assay did not miss any documented primary infection during this evaluation period, even without extending the positivity zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.