Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23090522›Full record

Trial reportObstetrics and gynecology2012

Continuation of the etonogestrel implant in women undergoing immediate postabortion placement.

Tessa Madden, David L Eisenberg, Qiuhong Zhao, Christina Buckel, Gina M Secura, Jeffrey F Peipert

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Obstetrics and gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Immediate versus delayed postabortal insertion of contraceptive implant.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tessa MaddenDivision of Clinical Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. maddent@wustl.edu
David L Eisenberg
Qiuhong Zhao
Christina Buckel
Gina M Secura
Jeffrey F Peipert
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

EVALUATION AND TESTING OF A DECISION SUPPORT AID IN CONTRACEPTIVE DECISION MAKINGK23HD070979 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MADDEN, TESSA · 2012 to 2014
$367k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD070979NICHD NIH HHS K23HD070979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate whether women who receive an immediate postabortion etonogestrel subdermal implant have higher discontinuation rates than women who undergo an interval insertion (insertion not associated with a recent pregnancy).

methodsThis was a secondary analysis of the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. We compared 12-month continuation rates for the subdermal implant between women undergoing immediate postabortion placement and women who underwent an interval placement. Continuation rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier estimator of survival function and Cox proportional hazard models.

resultsOver the study period, 141 women received the implant immediately postabortion and 935 women underwent an interval placement. The 12-month continuation rates were similar: 81.5% among women undergoing immediate postabortion placement and 82.8% among women undergoing interval placement (P=.54). In the survival analysis, women who received an immediate postabortion implant were no more likely to discontinue their method than women who had an interval placement (adjusted hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.68-1.60). The most common reason given for discontinuation was frequent or irregular bleeding, which was reported by 65.4% of women discontinuing in the immediate postabortion group and 56.7% in the interval group.

conclusionWomen who undergo immediate postabortion placement of the subdermal implant have high rates of continuation that are equivalent to women undergoing interval insertion. Immediate postabortion long-acting reversible contraceptives should be available to women undergoing induced abortion to decrease the risk of repeat unplanned pregnancy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Indexed as

Withholding TreatmentAdolescentAdultAftercareCohort StudiesContraceptive Agents, FemaleDesogestrelDrug ImplantsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyProspective StudiesTime FactorsUterine HemorrhageYoung AdultContraceptive Agents, FemaleDesogestrelDrug Implantsetonogestrel

Identifiers

PMID23090522
PMCPMC3711380
OpenAlexW1236513421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.