Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23090040›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical gastroenterology2013

The association between metabolic syndrome and colorectal neoplasm: systemic review and meta-analysis.

Raxitkumar Jinjuvadia, Prateek Lohia, Chetna Jinjuvadia, Sergio Montoya, Suthat Liangpunsakul

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity-related cancer Risk and Survival: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews With Meta-analysis of Observational Studies.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raxitkumar JinjuvadiaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wayne State University/Detroit Medical Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Prateek Lohia
Chetna Jinjuvadia
Sergio Montoya
Suthat Liangpunsakul
Detroit Medical Center · USWayne State University · USUniversity Medical Center · US

Funding

Effect of ethanol on Kupffer cell/hepatocyte interactions and lipid metabolismK08AA016570 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LIANGPUNSAKUL, SUTHAT · 2008 to 2012
$659k
Serum Proteomic Profiles as Biomarkers of Abusive Alcohol ConsumptionI01CX000361 · VA · RLR VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI LIANGPUNSAKUL, SUTHAT · 2012 to 2025
–
CSRD VA I01 CX000361NIAAA NIH HHS K08 AA016570
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere has been constant speculation about the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and colorectal neoplasia (CN); however, the published results are conflicting. The aims of this study are to conduct a systematic search, and assess the literature to determine the available evidence on the association between these two conditions.

methodsMeta-analysis was conducted based on relevant studies identified through a systematic literature review from PubMed, OvidSP, and Cochrane database during January 1980 to July 2011. A combined analysis was performed, followed by a subgroup analyses stratified by the study design, type of colorectal lesions, and sex. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg and Egger tests and visual inspection of funnel plot.

resultsEighteen studies were included in the final analysis. Overall, MetS was associated with 34% increase in the risk of CN [summary relative risk (RR), 1.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24-1.44]. The association between MetS and CN was found to be statistically significant in separate analysis for both case-control studies (summary RR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.44-1.73) and cohort studies (summary RR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.29). The association remained significant when analyses were restricted by type of colorectal lesions (colorectal cancer: RR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.18-1.43; colorectal adenoma: RR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26-1.49). Further subgroup analysis by sex showed significant association between MetS and CN in both male and female population.

conclusionsOur meta-analysis showed significant association between presence of MetS and CN. These results may help in identifying high-risk individuals at early stage, who might benefit from targeted colorectal cancer screening intervention.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesCohort StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsConfidence IntervalsEvidence-Based MedicineHumansMetabolic SyndromeRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID23090040
PMCPMC3518571
OpenAlexW2046897623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.