Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23090004›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastroenterology2013

The results of the Tokyo trial of prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis with risperidone (Tokyo P3R): a multicenter, randomized, phase II, non-placebo-controlled trial.

Takeshi Tsujino, Hiroyuki Isayama, Yousuke Nakai, Yukiko Ito, Osamu Togawa, Nobuo Toda, Toshihiko Arizumi, Hirofumi Kogure, Keisuke Yamamoto, Suguru Mizuno and 9 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.World journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2014
    Review
  5. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis.Current gastroenterology reports · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Takeshi TsujinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki Isayama
Yousuke Nakai
Yukiko Ito
Osamu Togawa
Nobuo Toda
Toshihiko Arizumi
Hirofumi Kogure
Keisuke Yamamoto
Suguru Mizuno
Yoko Yashima
Hiroshi Yagioka
Takashi Sasaki
Saburo Matsubara
Natsuyo Yamamoto
Kenji Hirano
Naoki Sasahira
Minoru Tada
Kazuhiko Koike
The University of Tokyo · JPJapanese Red Cross Medical Center · JPJR Tokyo General Hospital · JPKanto Central Hospital · JPMitsui Memorial Hospital · JPTeikyo University Chiba Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA previous study suggested that ulinastatin effectively prevented post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) and hyperenzymemia (PEH) in patients at average risk. In experimental models, risperidone, a selective serotonin 2A antagonist, ameliorated acute pancreatitis. We assessed the effect of risperidone combined with ulinastatin for the prevention of PEP in high-risk patients.

methodsIn a multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase II trial, patients undergoing therapeutic ERCP were randomly assigned to receive ulinastatin (150000 U) with or without risperidone (1 mg). A risperidone tablet was taken orally 30-60 min before ERCP and ulinastatin was administered intravenously for 10 min immediately prior to ERCP. The primary end point was the incidence of PEP; secondary end points were PEH severity and enzyme levels (amylase, pancreatic amylase, lipase).

resultsA total of 226 patients (113 per group) were included in the study. Six patients in the risperidone + ulinastatin group and ten patients in the ulinastatin group developed pancreatitis (5.3 vs. 8.8 %, p = 0.438). The incidence of moderate/severe PEP was lower in the risperidone + ulinastatin group (1.8 %) than in the ulinastatin group (4.4 %), but this difference was not significant. Although the incidence of PEH did not differ significantly, post-ERCP levels of all pancreatic enzymes were significantly lower in the risperidone + ulinastatin group.

conclusionsProphylactic oral risperidone administration in combination with ulinastatin did not reduce the incidence and severity of PEP in high-risk patients as compared with ulinastatin alone. However, risperidone showed an additive effect with ulinastatin, reducing serum pancreatic enzyme levels.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlycoproteinsHumansIncidenceInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPancreatitisRisperidoneSerotonin AntagonistsSeverity of Illness IndexGlycoproteinsRisperidoneSerotonin AntagonistsTrypsin Inhibitorsurinastatin

Identifiers

PMID23090004
OpenAlexW2039758127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.