Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23089756›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Fosfomycin-daptomycin and other fosfomycin combinations as alternative therapies in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

C Garrigós, O Murillo, J Lora-Tamayo, R Verdaguer, F Tubau, C Cabellos, J Cabo, J Ariza

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01898338 (Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy of Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Monotherapy for Treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01898338 phase3completednot on this map

Randomized Multicenter Study to Assess Efficacy of Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Monotherapy for Treatment of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia in Hospitalized Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMiquel PujolRan2013 to 2018Enrolled167ConditionsStaph Aureus Methicillin Resistant BacteremiaArmsFosfomycin 2gr/6h iv, Daptomycin 10mg/kg/24h iv
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. The role of fosfomycin in osteoarticular infection.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Infective endocarditis : Update on prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2016
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis in vitro and in vivo with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to fosfomycin.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C GarrigósLaboratory of Experimental Infection, Infectious Diseases Service, IDIBELL, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain. cgarrigos@idibell.cat
O Murillo
J Lora-Tamayo
R Verdaguer
F Tubau
C Cabellos
J Cabo
J Ariza
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of daptomycin, imipenem, or rifampin with fosfomycin was evaluated and compared with that of daptomycin-rifampin in a tissue cage model infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Strain HUSA 304 was used. The study yielded the following results for MICs (in μg/ml): fosfomycin, 4; daptomycin, 1; imipenem, 0.25; and rifampin, 0.03. The study yielded the following results for minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) (in μg/ml): fosfomycin, 8; daptomycin, 4; imipenem, 32; and rifampin, 0.5. Daptomycin-rifampin was confirmed as the most effective therapy against MRSA foreign-body infections. Fosfomycin combinations with high doses of daptomycin and rifampin were efficacious alternative therapies in this setting. Fosfomycin-imipenem was relatively ineffective and did not protect against resistance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsColony Count, MicrobialDaptomycinDisease Models, AnimalDrug CombinationsDrug Resistance, BacterialForeign-Body ReactionFosfomycinImipenemMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRatsRats, WistarRifampinStaphylococcal InfectionsAnti-Bacterial AgentsDaptomycinDrug CombinationsFosfomycinImipenemRifampin

Identifiers

PMID23089756
PMCPMC3535973
OpenAlexW2019117332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.