Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23089746›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2013

Evaluation of caspofungin susceptibility testing by the new Vitek 2 AST-YS06 yeast card using a unique collection of FKS wild-type and hot spot mutant isolates, including the five most common candida species.

Karen M Astvad, David S Perlin, Helle K Johansen, Rasmus H Jensen, Maiken C Arendrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Species-specific antifungal resistance trends in yeast bloodstream isolates causing candidemia before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from the INVIFAR Mexican multicenter network.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. A Practical Guide to Antifungal Susceptibility Testing.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Dominance ofIndian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A seven-year surveillance ofJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing: Current Approaches.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Echinocandin resistance: an emerging clinical problem?Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2014
    Review
  16. Antifungal susceptibility testing: current role from the clinical laboratory perspective.Mediterranean journal of hematology and infectious diseases · 2014
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karen M AstvadDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
David S Perlin
Helle K Johansen
Maiken C Arendrup

Funding

Rapid and Expandable Nucleic Acid Platform to Detect Bloodstream InfectionsU01AI066561 · NIAID · UNIV OF MED/DENT OF NJ-NJ MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI PERLIN, DAVID S · 2005 to 2009
$3.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI066561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FKS mutant isolates associated with breakthrough or failure cases are emerging in clinical settings. Discrimination of these from wild-type (wt) isolates in a routine laboratory setting is complicated. We evaluated the ability of caspofungin MIC determination using the new Vitek 2 AST-Y06 yeast susceptibility card to correctly identify the fks mutants from wt isolates and compared the performance to those of the CLSI and EUCAST reference methods. A collection of 98 Candida isolates, including 31 fks hot spot mutants, were included. Performance was evaluated using the FKS genotype as the "gold standard" and compared to those of the CLSI and EUCAST methodologies. The categorical agreement for Vitek 2 was 93.9%, compared to 88.4% for the CLSI method and 98.7% for the EUCAST method. Vitek 2 misclassified 19.4% (6/31) of the fks mutant isolates as susceptible, in contrast to <4% for each of the reference methods. The overall essential agreement between the CLSI method and Vitek 2 MICs was 92.6% (88/95) but was substantially lower for fks mutant isolates (78.6% [22/28]). Correct discrimination between susceptible and intermediate Candida glabrata isolates was not possible, as the revised species-specific susceptibility breakpoint was not included in the Vitek 2 detection range (MIC of ≤0.250 to ≥4 mg/liter). In conclusion, the Vitek 2 allowed correct categorization of all wt isolates as susceptible. However, despite an acceptable categorical agreement, it failed to reliably classify isolates harboring fks hot spot mutations as intermediate or resistant, which was in part due to the fact that the detection range did not span the susceptibility breakpoint for C. glabrata.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsCandidaCandida glabrataCandidiasisCaspofunginDrug Resistance, FungalEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsGlucosyltransferasesHumansLipopeptidesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMutationReagent StripsSensitivity and SpecificityAntifungal AgentsCaspofunginEchinocandinsFungal ProteinsGlucosyltransferasesLipopeptidesReagent Strips

Identifiers

PMID23089746
PMCPMC3535959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.