Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23089076›Full record

Trial reportEuropean neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology2013

Glycine treatment of the risk syndrome for psychosis: report of two pilot studies.

Scott W Woods, Barbara C Walsh, Keith A Hawkins, Tandy J Miller, John R Saksa, Deepak C D'Souza, Godfrey D Pearlson, Daniel C Javitt, Thomas H McGlashan, John H Krystal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Interventions for prodromal stage of psychosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Treatment of people at ultra-high risk for psychosis.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Early Intervention for Psychosis with N-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Modulators.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Scott W WoodsYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. scott.woods@yale.edu
Barbara C Walsh
Keith A Hawkins
Tandy J Miller
John R Saksa
Deepak C D'Souza
Godfrey D Pearlson
Daniel C Javitt
Thomas H McGlashan
John H Krystal
Yale University · USConnecticut Mental Health Center · USVA Connecticut Healthcare System · USInstitute for Community Living · USNathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research · US

Funding

PK/PD, DOSE FINDING AND ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT STUDIESU01MH074356 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI JAVITT, DANIEL C. · 2005 to 2009
$3.9M
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH074356NIMH NIH HHS U01MH74356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients meeting criteria for the risk syndrome for psychosis have treatment needs including positive and negative symptoms and cognitive impairment. These features could potentially respond to NMDA glycine-site agonists. The present objective was to determine which symptoms or domains of cognition promise to show the greatest response to glycine in risk syndrome patients. We conducted two short-term pilot studies of glycine used without adjunctive antipsychotic medication. In the first trial, 10 risk syndrome subjects received open-label glycine at doses titrated to 0.8 g/kg/d for 8 weeks, followed by discontinuation and 16 weeks of evaluation for durability of effects. In the second, 8 subjects were randomized to double-blind glycine vs. placebo for 12 weeks, followed by open-label glycine for another 12 weeks. Patients were evaluated every 1-2 weeks with the Scale Of Psychosis-risk Symptoms (SOPS) and before and after treatment with a neurocognitive battery. Within-group and between-group effect sizes were calculated. Effect sizes were large for positive (open-label within-group -1.10, double-blind between-group -1.11) and total (-1.39 and -1.15) symptoms and medium-to-large (-0.74 and -0.79) for negative symptoms. Medium or large effect sizes were also observed for several neurocognitive measures in the open-label study, although data were sparse. No safety concerns were identified. We conclude that glycine was associated with reduced symptoms with promising effect sizes in two pilot studies and a possibility of improvement in cognitive function. Further studies of agents that facilitate NMDA receptor function in risk syndrome patients are supported by these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorAdultCognition DisordersDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycineGlycine AgentsHumansMaleNutritive SweetenersPilot ProjectsProdromal SymptomsPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesGlycineGlycine AgentsNutritive SweetenersGlycineNMDA receptorProdromePsychosisRisk syndromeSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID23089076
PMCPMC4028140
OpenAlexW2032515910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.