ArticleBMC medicine2012
Anatomy of open access publishing: a study of longitudinal development and internal structure.
Article in BMC medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed.
- Has open access in neurosurgery made access easier but sharing harder? A National survey from an LMIC (Turkey).Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Hurdles to open access publishing faced by authors: a scoping literature review from 2004 to 2023.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Economic and geographical disparities in global contribution to open access publishing in anaesthesiology: A bibliometric analysis.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2025Article
- How To Cope With Predatory Journals.Journal of Korean medical science · 2025Review
- Variability in article processing charges of open-access publishing across medical specialties.PloS one · 2025Article
- Get Free Copy: a multi-repository search platform for biomedical publications.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Article
- Methodological Quality of Open Access Compared to Traditional Journal Publications in the Plastic Surgery Literature.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Review
- The changing landscape of scientific communication: open access, predatory journals and the near future.Journal of nephrology · 2023Article
- Higher Author Fees in Gastroenterology Journals Are Not Associated with Faster Processing Times or Higher Impact.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- The use of the phrase "data not shown" in dental research.PloS one · 2022Article
- Open Access Fees: A Barrier to Scholarly Activity Among Neurology Trainees.The Permanente journal · 2021Article
- Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open access publishing each year.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Publishing habits and perceptions of open access publishing and public access amongst clinical and research fellows.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2020Article
- Open Access Publishing and Subsequent Citations Among Articles in Major Cardiovascular Journals.The American journal of medicine · 2019Article
- On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- The frequency and availability of population-specific patient reported outcome measures and minimal clinically important differences among approved drugs in Canada.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2019Article
- Open access availability of Catalonia research output: Case analysis of the CERCA institution, 2011-2015.PloS one · 2019Article
- Size matters! Association between journal size and longitudinal variability of the Journal Impact Factor.PloS one · 2019Article
- Discipline-specific open access publishing practices and barriers to change: an evidence-based review.F1000Research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen access (OA) is a revolutionary way of providing access to the scholarly journal literature made possible by the Internet. The primary aim of this study was to measure the volume of scientific articles published in full immediate OA journals from 2000 to 2011, while observing longitudinal internal shifts in the structure of OA publishing concerning revenue models, publisher types and relative distribution among scientific disciplines. The secondary aim was to measure the share of OA articles of all journal articles, including articles made OA by publishers with a delay and individual author-paid OA articles in subscription journals (hybrid OA), as these subsets of OA publishing have mostly been ignored in previous studies.
methodsStratified random sampling of journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (n = 787) was performed. The annual publication volumes spanning 2000 to 2011 were retrieved from major publication indexes and through manual data collection.
resultsAn estimated 340,000 articles were published by 6,713 full immediate OA journals during 2011. OA journals requiring article-processing charges have become increasingly common, publishing 166,700 articles in 2011 (49% of all OA articles). This growth is related to the growth of commercial publishers, who, despite only a marginal presence a decade ago, have grown to become key actors on the OA scene, responsible for 120,000 of the articles published in 2011. Publication volume has grown within all major scientific disciplines, however, biomedicine has seen a particularly rapid 16-fold growth between 2000 (7,400 articles) and 2011 (120,900 articles). Over the past decade, OA journal publishing has steadily increased its relative share of all scholarly journal articles by about 1% annually. Approximately 17% of the 1.66 million articles published during 2011 and indexed in the most comprehensive article-level index of scholarly articles (Scopus) are available OA through journal publishers, most articles immediately (12%) but some within 12 months of publication (5%).
conclusionsOA journal publishing is disrupting the dominant subscription-based model of scientific publishing, having rapidly grown in relative annual share of published journal articles during the last decade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.