Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23088445›Full record

ReviewGenome biology2012

The roles of the reprogramming factors Oct4, Sox2 and Klf4 in resetting the somatic cell epigenome during induced pluripotent stem cell generation.

Ryan Schmidt, Kathrin Plath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genome biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transforming meat waste into sustainable corneal keratoplasty models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ryan Schmidt
Kathrin Plath

Funding

UCLA-Caltech Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM008042 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI AJIJOLA, OLUJIMI A, DAWSON, DAVID WAYNE · 1985 to 2023
$29.9M
Roles of sumoylation and alternative polyadenylation in cellular reprogrammingP01GM099134 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PLATH, KATHRIN · 2011 to 2021
$20.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM099134NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic cell reprogramming to induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells by defined factors is a form of engineered reverse development carried out in vitro. Recent investigation has begun to elucidate the molecular mechanisms whereby these factors function to reset the epigenome.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCellular ReprogrammingEpigenesis, GeneticGenomeHumansKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pluripotent Stem CellsSOXB1 Transcription FactorsKLF4 protein, humanKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3SOXB1 Transcription Factors

Identifiers

PMID23088445
PMCPMC3491406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.