Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23088364›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2012

Denaturation of RNA secondary and tertiary structure by urea: simple unfolded state models and free energy parameters account for measured m-values.

Dominic Lambert, David E Draper

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chemical Annealing Restructures RNA for Nanopore Detection.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Application of Nucleic Acid Mimics in Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Urea-aromatic interactions in biology.Biophysical reviews · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dominic LambertDepartment of Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218, United States.
David E Draper
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

FACTORS STABILIZING RNA STRUCTURESR01GM058545 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DRAPER, DAVID E. · 1999 to 2014
$2.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01 GM58545NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To investigate the mechanism by which urea destabilizes RNA structure, urea-induced unfolding of four different RNA secondary and tertiary structures was quantified in terms of an m-value, the rate at which the free energy of unfolding changes with urea molality. From literature data and our osmometric study of a backbone analogue, we derived average interaction potentials (per square angstrom of solvent accessible surface) between urea and three kinds of RNA surfaces: phosphate, ribose, and base. Estimates of the increases in solvent accessible surface areas upon RNA denaturation were based on a simple model of unfolded RNA as a combination of helical and single-strand segments. These estimates, combined with the three interaction potentials and a term to account for interactions of urea with released ions, yield calculated m-values that are in good agreement with experimental values (200 mm monovalent salt). Agreement was obtained only if single-stranded RNAs were modeled in a highly stacked, A-form conformation. The primary driving force for urea-induced denaturation is the strong interaction of urea with the large surface areas of bases that become exposed upon denaturation of either RNA secondary or tertiary structure, though interactions of urea with backbone and released ions may account for up to a third of the m-value. Urea m-values for all four RNAs are salt-dependent, which we attribute to an increased extension (or decreased charge density) of unfolded RNAs with an increased urea concentration. The sensitivity of the urea m-value to base surface exposure makes it a potentially useful probe of the conformations of RNA unfolded states.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid DenaturationEntropyNucleic Acid ConformationRiboswitchRNAThermodynamicsUreaRiboswitchRNAUrea

Identifiers

PMID23088364
PMCPMC3505219
OpenAlexW2000656899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.