Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23088328›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2014

Injectable and implantable sustained release naltrexone in the treatment of opioid addiction.

Nikolaj Kunøe, Philipp Lobmaier, Hanh Ngo, Gary Hulse

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Nanotherapeutics for Alleviating Anesthesia-Associated Complications.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Naltrexone Implant for Opioid Use Disorder.Neurology international · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in the delivery of buprenorphine for opioid dependence.Drug design, development and therapy · 2017
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Themed section.British journal of pharmacology · 2015
    Article
  19. Drugs for addiction: a therapeutic area in need of a 'shot in the arm'.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2014
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nikolaj KunøeThe Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Philipp Lobmaier
Hanh Ngo
Gary Hulse
University of Western Australia · AUOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustained release technologies for administering the opioid antagonist naltrexone (SRX) have the potential to assist opioid-addicted patients in their efforts to maintain abstinence from heroin and other opioid agonists. Recently, reliable SRX formulations in intramuscular or implantable polymers that release naltrexone for 1-7 months have become available for clinical use and research. This qualitative review of the literature provides an overview of the technologies currently available for SRX and their effectiveness in reducing opioid use and other relevant outcomes. The majority of studies indicate that SRX is effective in reducing heroin use, and the most frequently studied SRX formulations have acceptable adverse events profiles. Registry data indicate a protective effect of SRX on mortality and morbidity. In some studies, SRX also seems to affect other outcomes, such as concomitant substance use, vocational training attendance, needle use, and risk behaviour for blood-borne diseases such as hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus. There is a general need for more controlled studies, in particular to compare SRX with agonist maintenance treatment, to study combinations of SRX with behavioural interventions, and to study at-risk groups such as prison inmates or opioid-addicted pregnant patients. The literature suggests that sustained release naltrexone is a feasible, safe and effective option for assisting abstinence efforts in opioid addiction.

Indexed as

Delayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsFemaleHeroin DependenceHumansNaltrexoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrisonersTime FactorsDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug ImplantsNaltrexoneNarcotic Antagonistsdrug addictiondrug dependencenaltrexoneopioidssubstance-related disorderssustained release

Identifiers

PMID23088328
PMCPMC4014017
OpenAlexW1489894199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.