Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23087411›Full record

ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2013

Incorporating auxiliary information for improved prediction in high-dimensional datasets: an ensemble of shrinkage approaches.

Philip S Boonstra, Jeremy M G Taylor, Bhramar Mukherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Integrating Information from Existing Risk Prediction Models with No Model Details.The Canadian journal of statistics = Revue canadienne de statistique · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Combining Multiple Observational Data Sources to Estimate Causal Effects.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip S BoonstraDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. philb@umich.edu
Jeremy M G Taylor
Bhramar Mukherjee

Funding

Strategic Vision & Impact on Environmental HealthP30ES017885 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Dana Dolinoy · 2011 to 2026
$21.3M
Biostatistics Training Program in Cancer ResearchT32CA083654 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani, Kelley McLain Kidwell · 2002 to 2026
$4.3M
Statistical Methods for Cancer BiomarkersR01CA129102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GHOSH, DEBASHIS, TAYLOR, JEREMY M.G. · 2009 to 2021
$3.3M
Efficient Design and Analytic Strategies for Enhancing the Power of Detecting G XR21ES020811 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2012 to 2014
$447k
Two-Phase Cancer Studies of Gene-Environment InteractionR03CA156608 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUKHERJEE, BHRAMAR · 2011 to 2012
$150k
NCI NIH HHS CA129102NCI NIH HHS CA156608NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129102NCI NIH HHS T32 CA083654NIEHS NIH HHS ES020811NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES017885NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES020811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With advancement in genomic technologies, it is common that two high-dimensional datasets are available, both measuring the same underlying biological phenomenon with different techniques. We consider predicting a continuous outcome Y using X, a set of p markers which is the best available measure of the underlying biological process. This same biological process may also be measured by W, coming from a prior technology but correlated with X. On a moderately sized sample, we have (Y,X,W), and on a larger sample we have (Y,W). We utilize the data on W to boost the prediction of Y by X. When p is large and the subsample containing X is small, this is a p>n situation. When p is small, this is akin to the classical measurement error problem; however, ours is not the typical goal of calibrating W for use in future studies. We propose to shrink the regression coefficients β of Y on X toward different targets that use information derived from W in the larger dataset. We compare these proposals with the classical ridge regression of Y on X, which does not use W. We also unify all of these methods as targeted ridge estimators. Finally, we propose a hybrid estimator which is a linear combination of multiple estimators of β. With an optimal choice of weights, the hybrid estimator balances efficiency and robustness in a data-adaptive way to theoretically yield a smaller prediction error than any of its constituents. The methods, including a fully Bayesian alternative, are evaluated via simulation studies. We also apply them to a gene-expression dataset. mRNA expression measured via quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction is used to predict survival time in lung cancer patients, with auxiliary information from microarray technology available on a larger sample.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBayes TheoremBiostatisticsComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGenomicsHumansLeast-Squares AnalysisLinear ModelsLung NeoplasmsRegression AnalysisSurvival Analysis

Identifiers

PMID23087411
PMCPMC3590922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.