Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23086837›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2013

From QSAR to QSIIR: searching for enhanced computational toxicology models.

Hao Zhu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. In silico toxicology: computational methods for the prediction of chemical toxicity.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Computational molecular science · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hao ZhuDepartment of Chemistry, The Rutgers Center for Computational and Integrative Biology, Rutgers University, 315 Penn St., Camden, NJ, 08102, USA. haozhu@email.unc.edu

Funding

Predictive Computational Acute Toxicity Modeling by Profiling Chemicals With PublR15ES023148 · NIEHS · RUTGERS THE STATE UNIV OF NJ CAMDEN · PI ZHU, HAO · 2013 to 2018
$941k
NIEHS NIH HHS R15 ES023148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) is the most frequently used modeling approach to explore the dependency of biological, toxicological, or other types of activities/properties of chemicals on their molecular features. In the past two decades, QSAR modeling has been used extensively in drug discovery process. However, the predictive models resulted from QSAR studies have limited use for chemical risk assessment, especially for animal and human toxicity evaluations, due to the low predictivity of new compounds. To develop enhanced toxicity models with independently validated external prediction power, novel modeling protocols were pursued by computational toxicologists based on rapidly increasing toxicity testing data in recent years. This chapter reviews the recent effort in our laboratory to incorporate the biological testing results as descriptors in the toxicity modeling process. This effort extended the concept of QSAR to quantitative structure in vitro-in vivo relationship (QSIIR). The QSIIR study examples provided in this chapter indicate that the QSIIR models that based on the hybrid (biological and chemical) descriptors are indeed superior to the conventional QSAR models that only based on chemical descriptors for several animal toxicity endpoints. We believe that the applications introduced in this review will be of interest and value to researchers working in the field of computational drug discovery and environmental chemical risk assessment.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, MolecularQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipAnimalsHumansROC CurveToxicity TestsToxicology

Identifiers

PMID23086837
PMCPMC5591172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.