ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2012
eHealth program to empower patients in returning to normal activities and work after gynecological surgery: intervention mapping as a useful method for development.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05373550 (Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Self-esteem in Hysterectomized Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Self-esteem in Hysterectomized Women: a Mixed-method Approach
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions Developed with the Intervention Mapping Protocol in Work Disability Prevention: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2019Pooled it
- Occupational advice to help people return to work following lower limb arthroplasty: the OPAL intervention mapping study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2020Trial
- Development of an occupational advice intervention for patients undergoing lower limb arthroplasty (the OPAL study).BMC health services research · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Process evaluation of a multidisciplinary care program for patients undergoing gynaecological surgery.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2014Trial
- Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary care program on recovery and return to work of patients after gynaecological surgery; design of a randomized controlled trial.BMC health services research · 2012Trial
- Developing a training program based on intervention mapping to improve healthcare professionals' communication skills: A study protocol.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Stakeholders barriers and facilitators for the implementation of a personalised digital care pathway: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Postoperative Recovery and Time Off Work of Patients with Benign Indications for Surgery - Results of a Prospective Study.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2020Article
- Using intervention mapping to develop an occupational advice intervention to aid return to work following hip and knee replacement in the United Kingdom.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Participatory Methods to Engage Health Service Users in the Development of Electronic Health Resources: Systematic Review.Journal of participatory medicine · 2019Review
- Electronic Health Program to Empower Patients in Returning to Normal Activities After General Surgical and Gynecological Procedures: Intervention Mapping as a Useful Method for Further Development.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- A Smartphone App to Promote an Active Lifestyle in Lower-Educated Working Young Adults: Development, Usability, Acceptability, and Feasibility Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2018Article
- Engaging stakeholders in the co-development of programs or interventions using Intervention Mapping: A scoping review.PloS one · 2018Article
- Planning theory- and evidence-based behavior change interventions: a conceptual review of the intervention mapping protocol.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2017Review
- Using e-health in perioperative care: a survey study investigating shortcomings in current perioperative care and possible future solutions.BMC surgery · 2017Article
- Substitution of Usual Perioperative Care by eHealth to Enhance Postoperative Recovery in Patients Undergoing General Surgical or Gynecological Procedures: Study Protocol of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2016Article
- A modified Delphi method toward multidisciplinary consensus on functional convalescence recommendations after abdominal surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Bridging Health Care and the Workplace: Formulation of a Return-to-Work Intervention for Breast Cancer Patients Using an Intervention Mapping Approach.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFull recovery after gynecological surgery takes much longer than expected regardless of surgical technique or the level of invasiveness. After discharge, detailed convalescence recommendations are not provided to patients typically, and postoperative care is fragmented, poorly coordinated, and given only on demand. For patients, this contributes to irrational beliefs and avoidance of resumption of activities and can result in a prolonged sick leave.
objectiveTo develop an eHealth intervention that empowers gynecological patients during the perioperative period to obtain timely return to work (RTW) and prevent work disability.
methodsThe intervention mapping (IM) protocol was used to develop the eHealth intervention. A literature search about behavioral and environmental conditions of prolonged sick leave and delayed RTW in patients was performed. Patients' needs, attitudes, and beliefs regarding postoperative recovery and resumption of work were identified through focus group discussions. Additionally, a literature search was performed to obtain determinants, methods, and strategies for the development of a suitable interactive eHealth intervention to empower patients to return to normal activities after gynecological surgery, including work. Finally, the eHealth intervention was evaluated by focus group participants, medical doctors, and eHealth specialists through questionnaires.
resultsTwenty-one patients participated in the focus group discussions. Sufficient, uniform, and tailored information regarding surgical procedures, complications, and resumption of activities and work were considered most essential. Knowing who to contact in case of mental or physical complaints, and counseling and tools for work reintegration were also considered important. Finally, opportunities to exchange experiences with other patients were a major issue. Considering the determinants of the Attitude-Social influence-self-Efficacy (ASE) model, various strategies based on a combination of theory and evidence were used, resulting in an eHealth intervention with different interactive functionalities including tailored convalescence recommendations and a video to communicate the most common pitfalls during the perioperative period to patients and employers. Fifteen patients in the focus groups, 11 physicians, and 3 eHealth specialists suggested points for improvement to optimize the usability of the eHealth intervention and judged it an approachable, appropriate, and attractive eHealth intervention to empower gynecological patients.
conclusionsThe IM protocol was a useful method to develop an eHealth intervention based on both theory and evidence. All patients and stakeholders judged the eHealth intervention to be a promising tool to empower gynecological patients during the perioperative period and to help them to return to normal activities and work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.