Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23086469›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2013

Genetics and public health: the experience of a reference center for diagnosis of 22q11.2 deletion in Brazil and suggestions for implementing genetic testing.

Társis Paiva Vieira, Ilária Cristina Sgardioli, Vera Lúcia Gil-da-Silva-Lopes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Társis Paiva VieiraDepartment of Medical Genetics, University of Campinas, Rua Tessália Vieira de Camargo, 126, CEP 13083-887, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Ilária Cristina Sgardioli
Vera Lúcia Gil-da-Silva-Lopes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the prevalence of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2 DS) of around 1:4,000 and of palatal abnormalities in 70 % of the cases of 22q11.2 DS and taking into account the Brazilian health system and its current situation of medical genetic services, this study aims to contribute to establish strategies for genetic diagnosis. The access to genetic testing at 11 services was investigated and samples from 100 patients with palatal abnormalities and suspicion of 22q11.2 DS were sent to a reference center. Laboratorial techniques included karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Costs were also calculated. Disparities among centers for genetic diagnosis were evident, with remarkable regional differences. Some of the obstacles encountered were difficulties for families to show up for medical appointments, complementary evaluations, and for the clinics to send the samples to the reference center. A conclusive diagnosis was reached for 38 % of patients. Combination of karyotyping and FISH had better laboratorial cost-effectiveness. These results might represent the reality for the investigation of other genetic conditions. Clinical and laboratorial approaches herein presented could be adapted for use under different genetic conditions in the Brazilian health system, which has relatively limited financial and human resources. Suggestions for the rational implementation of genetic testing in developing countries are presented.

Identifiers

PMID23086469
PMCPMC3537976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.