Trial reportJournal of neurology2013
Effects of cerebellar infarcts on cortical processing of saccades.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- The frequency and characteristics of saccadic dysmetria in isolated cerebellar infarction.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Article
- The complexity of eye-hand coordination: a perspective on cortico-cerebellar cooperation.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2020Article
- The role of dentate nuclei in human oculomotor control: insights from cerebrotendinous xanthomatosis.The Journal of physiology · 2017Article
- What do eye movements tell us about patients with neurological disorders? - An introduction to saccade recording in the clinical setting.Proceedings of the Japan Academy. Series B, Physical and biological sciences · 2017Review
- Implications of Lateral Cerebellum in Proactive Control of Saccades.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to investigate cerebellar influences on cortical components of saccadic eye movement programming in human subjects. In 24 patients with a localized cerebellar lesion, saccadic eye movements were recorded in different reflexive (step, gap, overlap) and intentional (anti, memory, short memory sequences) tasks and compared to 23 healthy controls. The cerebellar lesions led to impairments in different saccade parameters. Cerebellar patients tended to show hypermetria and increased latencies compared to the control group. In particular, they executed significantly more erroneous saccades specifically in the memory task (suppression errors) but not in the anti task (pro-saccade errors). Moreover, while reproducing short sequences of saccades from memory, patients with cerebellar infarcts made more errors with regard to the sequence order than controls. The influence of cerebellar hemispheric lesions on the saccade latency, the task-specific lesion effects on the frequency of suppression errors, and the effects on the number of order errors suggest that the cerebellum is involved in cortical processes such as target selection and sequence reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.