Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23085832›Full record

Trial reportBone marrow transplantation2013

Long-term follow-up of children conditioned with Treosulfan: German and Austrian experience.

R Beier, A Schulz, M Hönig, M Eyrich, P-G Schlegel, W Holter, K D Stachel, K Ehlert, J Greil, W Nürnberger and 10 more

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Bone marrow transplantation, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Using Treosulfan-Based Conditioning for Treatment of Marrow Failure Disorders.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2017
    Trial
  5. Treosulfan-based conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation for nonmalignant diseases: a prospective multicenter trial.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2014
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Treosulfan-based conditioning for inborn errors of immunity.Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

R BeierDepartment of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
A Schulz
M Hönig
M Eyrich
P-G Schlegel
W Holter
K D Stachel
K Ehlert
J Greil
W Nürnberger
W Wössmann
P Bader
C Urban
I Müller
M Suttorp
M Sauer
B Gruhn
R Meisel
M Zimmermann
K-W Sykora
Boston Children's Hospital · USMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversität Ulm · DEFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEMedical University of Graz · ATSt Anna Children's Hospital · ATUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the long-term follow-up of children transplanted with Treosulfan (TREO)-based conditioning in Germany and Austria. Nine centres reported a total of 109 transplantations. Patients were stratified according to the paediatric TRM risk score derived from the paediatric BMT registry (PRST) and compared with the historical transplant population of this registry. Underlying diseases were malignancies, immunodeficiencies, and haematologic and metabolic disorders. TREO total dose ranged from 21-42 g/m(2). Additional conditioning drugs included fludarabine, thiotepa, melphalan, CY and/or TBI. EFS at 3 years for non-malignant and malignant diseases was 88% and 49%, respectively. Leukaemia patients in remission had a survival of 51% at 3 years; nonremission patients relapsed and died within 18 months. TRM and OS in the low-risk groups 0 and 1 were similar to PRST controls. TRM in the high-risk groups 2 and 3 was markedly lower (9% vs 28% and 13% vs 53%, respectively) than in the PRST group, but OS was similar. In conclusion, TREO-based conditioning regimens in children resulted in excellent engraftment and long-term survival in nonmalignant disease. In high-risk malignancy, low acute toxicity was followed by low TRM but it did not translate into increased survival.

Indexed as

Bone Marrow TransplantationRegistriesAdolescentAdultAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingAustriaBusulfanChildChild, PreschoolCommon Variable ImmunodeficiencyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGermanyHumansInfantAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBusulfanMyeloablative Agoniststreosulfan

Identifiers

PMID23085832
OpenAlexW2037051255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.