Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23083495›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2013

Induced abortion, contraceptive use, and dual protection among female sex workers in Moscow, Russia.

Michele R Decker, Eileen A Yam, Andrea L Wirtz, Stefan D Baral, Alena Peryshkina, Vladmir Mogilnyi, Chris Beyrer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
21.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Contraceptive use among female sex workers in three Russian cities.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michele R DeckerDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. mdecker@jhsph.edu
Eileen A Yam
Andrea L Wirtz
Stefan D Baral
Alena Peryshkina
Vladmir Mogilnyi
Chris Beyrer
Johns Hopkins University · USPopulation Council · US

Funding

Risks for HIV and STIs among Moscow Sex WorkersR01DA015005 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BEYRER, CHRIS · 2002 to 2005
$1.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015005NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA15005PHS HHS 2 D 43TWOOOO10-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe abortion history and current contraceptive use among female sex workers (FSWs) in Moscow, Russia.

methodsA clinic-based survey was conducted among 147 FSWs in Moscow during an 8-month period in 2005.

resultsIn total, 83 of 143 (58.0%) FSWs reported a history of abortion, with 45 of 143 (31.5%) indicating multiple abortions. Condoms were the primary form of contraception (145/146 [99.3%]); just 17 of 142 (12.0%) FSWs reported using non-barrier modern contraception. All women who reported using a non-barrier modern method also indicated condom use (i.e. dual protection). Non-barrier contraceptive use was associated with inconsistent condom use (odds ratio [OR] 3.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-9.02) and multiple abortions (OR 4.71; 95% CI, 1.19-18.62).

conclusionThe results illustrate substantial risk for unintended pregnancy among FSWs. Further research is needed regarding the dynamics of non-barrier contraception and condom use. Efforts to improve the health and wellbeing of FSWs should include access to safe and effective contraception, in addition to HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAdolescentAdultCondomsContraceptionContraception BehaviorContraceptive AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesData CollectionFemaleHumansMoscowPregnancyPregnancy, UnplannedSex WorkYoung AdultContraceptive Agents

Identifiers

PMID23083495
PMCPMC3529991
OpenAlexW1998953532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.