Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23083095›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of pharmacology2013

Pharmacological characterization of LPS and opioid interactions at the toll-like receptor 4.

C W Stevens, S Aravind, S Das, R L Davis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of pharmacology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Determining theFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activities against VariousMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C W StevensDepartment of Pharmacology and Physiology, Oklahoma State University-Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK 74107, USA. cw.stevens@okstate.edu
S Aravind
S Das
R L Davis
Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences · US

Funding

Attenuation of astroglial chemokine expression by beta-funaltrexamine: implicatioR15NS062664 · NINDS · OSU CENTER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DAVIS, RANDALL L · 2008 to 2008
$198k
NINDS NIH HHS NS 062664NINDS NIH HHS R15 NS062664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePrevious work in our laboratory showed opioid agents inhibit cytokine expression in astrocytes. Recently, Watkins and colleagues hypothesized that opioid agonists activate toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signalling, which leads to neuroinflammation. To test this hypothesis, we characterized LPS and opioid effects on TLR4 signalling in reporter cells. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: NF-κB reporter cells expressing high levels of TLR4 were used to compare LPS and opioid effects on NF-κB activation, a pathway activated by TLR4 stimulation. KEY

resultsLPS increased TLR4 signalling in a concentration-dependent manner and was antagonized by LPS antagonist (LPS-RS, from Rhodobacter sphaeroides). A concentration ratio analysis showed that LPS-RS was a competitive antagonist. The opioid agonists, morphine and fentanyl, produced minor activation of TLR4 signalling when given alone. When tested following LPS stimulation, opioid agonists inhibited NF-κB activation but this inhibition was not blocked by the general opioid antagonist, naloxone, nor by the selective μ opioid receptor antagonist, β-FNA. Indeed, both naloxone and β-FNA also inhibited NF-κB activation in reporter cells. Further examination of fentanyl and β-FNA effects revealed that both opioid agents inhibited LPS signalling in a non-competitive fashion. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These results show that LPS-RS is a competitive antagonist at the TLR4 complex, and that both opioid agonists and antagonists inhibit LPS signalling in a non-competitive fashion through a non-GPCR, opioid site(s) in the TLR4 signalling pathway. If confirmed, existing opioid agents or other drug molecules more selective at this novel site may provide a new therapeutic approach to the treatment of neuroinflammation.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBinding, CompetitiveDrug AntagonismEscherichia coli K12Genes, ReporterHEK293 CellsHumansKineticsLigandsLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesLymphocyte Antigen 96Narcotic AntagonistsNerve Tissue ProteinsNF-kappa B p50 SubunitReceptors, Opioid, muAnalgesics, OpioidK-12 lipopolysaccharideLigandsLipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLipopolysaccharidesLY96 protein, humanLymphocyte Antigen 96Narcotic AntagonistsNerve Tissue ProteinsNF-kappa B p50 SubunitNFKB1 protein, humanReceptors, Opioid, muRecombinant ProteinsTLR4 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 4

Identifiers

PMID23083095
PMCPMC3596647
OpenAlexW1595940447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.