Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23082047›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2012

c-Met in pancreatic cancer stem cells: therapeutic implications.

Marta Herreros-Villanueva, Aizpea Zubia-Olascoaga, Luis Bujanda

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Pancreatic Cancer and Therapy: Role and Regulation of Cancer Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pancreatic cancer actionable genes in precision medicine and personalized surgery.The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marta Herreros-VillanuevaDivision of Oncology Research, Department of Medicine, Schulze Center for Novel Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Aizpea Zubia-Olascoaga
Luis Bujanda
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is the deadliest solid cancer and currently the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths. Emerging evidence suggests that cancer stem cells (CSCs) play a crucial role in the development and progression of this disease. The identification of CSC markers could lead to the development of new therapeutic targets. In this study, the authors explore the functional role of c-Met in pancreatic CSCs, by analyzing self-renewal with sphere assays and tumorigenicity capacity in NOD SCID mice. They concluded that c-Met is a novel marker for identifying pancreatic CSCs and c-Met(high) in a higher tumorigenic cancer cell population. Inhibition of c-Met with XL184 blocks self-renewal capacity in pancreatic CSCs. In pancreatic tumors established in NOD SCID mice, c-Met inhibition slowed tumor growth and reduced the population of CSCs, along with preventing the development of metastases.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkers, TumorMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDNeoplastic Stem CellsPancreatic NeoplasmsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metBiomarkers, TumorProto-Oncogene Proteins c-metCancer stem cellsc-MetGemcitabineSelf-renewalTumorigenicity

Identifiers

PMID23082047
PMCPMC3471099
OpenAlexW2021119920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.