Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23081827›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2013

Characterizing antiprion compounds based on their binding properties to prion proteins: implications as medical chaperones.

Yuji O Kamatari, Yosuke Hayano, Kei-ichi Yamaguchi, Junji Hosokawa-Muto, Kazuo Kuwata

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Therapeutic Trajectories in Human Prion Diseases.Sub-cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Unfolded and intermediate states of PrP play a key role in the mechanism of action of an antiprion chaperone.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Direct interaction of DNMT inhibitors to PrPActa pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Insights from Therapeutic Studies for PrP Prion Disease.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuji O KamatariLife Science Research Center, Gifu University, Gifu 501-1194, Japan.
Yosuke Hayano
Kei-ichi Yamaguchi
Junji Hosokawa-Muto
Kazuo Kuwata
Gifu University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A variety of antiprion compounds have been reported that are effective in ex vivo and in vivo treatment experiments. However, the molecular mechanisms for most of these compounds remain unknown. Here we classified antiprion mechanisms into four categories: I, specific conformational stabilization; II, nonspecific stabilization; III, aggregation; and IV, interaction with molecules other than PrP(C). To characterize antiprion compounds based on this classification, we determined their binding affinities to PrP(C) using surface plasmon resonance and their binding sites on PrP(C) using NMR spectroscopy. GN8 and GJP49 bound specifically to the hot spot in PrP(C), and acted as "medical chaperones" to stabilize the native conformation. Thus, mechanisms I was predominant. In contrast, quinacrine and epigallocathechin bound to PrP(C) rather nonspecifically; these may stabilize the PrP(C) conformation nonspecifically including the interference with the intermolecular interaction following mechanism II. Congo red and pentosan polysulfate bound to PrP(C) and caused aggregation and precipitation of PrP(C), thus reducing the effective concentration of prion protein. Thus, mechanism III was appropriate. Finally, CP-60, an edarabone derivative, did not bind to PrP(C). Thus these were classified into mechanism IV. However, their antiprion activities were not confirmed in the GT + FK system, whose details remain to be elucidated. This proposed antiprion mechanisms of diverse antiprion compounds could help to elucidate their antiprion activities and facilitate effective antiprion drug discovery.

Indexed as

AmidesAminopyridinesAnimalsBinding SitesCarbazolesCatechinCongo RedMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMiceMolecular ChaperonesMolecular StructureNitrilesPentosan Sulfuric PolyesterPiperidinesPrionsProtein Conformation2,3,4,9-tetrahydro-9-(2-hydroxy-3-(1-piperidinyl)propyl)-6-methyl-1H-carbazol-1-oneAmidesAminopyridinesCarbazolesCatechinCongo RedCp 60 compoundepigallocatechin gallateMolecular ChaperonesNitrilesPentosan Sulfuric PolyesterPiperidinesPrionsQuinacrine

Identifiers

PMID23081827
PMCPMC3575857
OpenAlexW2116761360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.